willie_901
Veteran
Huss,
I will speculate the overexposed sky caused the Nikon's automated, JPEG, rendering parameter-selection algorithms to fail. The firmware decided the sky had to be blue. Of course the light that illuminated this scene was not from a deep-blue sky.
Since Nikon decided all customers need/want/deserve is an 8-bit JPEG, the data you required to correct the automated rendering was no longer available.
With a raw file all the data is present. I'd bet a couple of minutes applying subtle selective brightness and color temperature rendering parameters would even fix the tree.
This review mentions (link) some of the same disappointments. You are not alone.
I am really fed up with Nikon's arrogantly deciding what customers can or can not be able to do. Whether it's a lack of manual focusing aids for AI/AIS lens, not offering high-quality primes for APS-C owners, or not offering a non-automated, raw option for the D850 Digitizer, Nikon has to stop thinking they get to make decisions for their customers. Surely a significant percentage of their D850 customer base render raw files on a regular basis. I have no issue with a turn key JPEG solution. But it is absurd not to offer D850 owners (or anyone else) the option to select raw + JPEG. How many R&D resources were required to add just that option? Would one more menu option significantly increase the usage frustration level?
Based on your experience and the review linked above, I would wager using raw and batch processing them with fully automated rendering in post-production would be more successful and convenient than using the D850 Negative Digitizer.
I will speculate the overexposed sky caused the Nikon's automated, JPEG, rendering parameter-selection algorithms to fail. The firmware decided the sky had to be blue. Of course the light that illuminated this scene was not from a deep-blue sky.
Since Nikon decided all customers need/want/deserve is an 8-bit JPEG, the data you required to correct the automated rendering was no longer available.
With a raw file all the data is present. I'd bet a couple of minutes applying subtle selective brightness and color temperature rendering parameters would even fix the tree.
This review mentions (link) some of the same disappointments. You are not alone.
I am really fed up with Nikon's arrogantly deciding what customers can or can not be able to do. Whether it's a lack of manual focusing aids for AI/AIS lens, not offering high-quality primes for APS-C owners, or not offering a non-automated, raw option for the D850 Digitizer, Nikon has to stop thinking they get to make decisions for their customers. Surely a significant percentage of their D850 customer base render raw files on a regular basis. I have no issue with a turn key JPEG solution. But it is absurd not to offer D850 owners (or anyone else) the option to select raw + JPEG. How many R&D resources were required to add just that option? Would one more menu option significantly increase the usage frustration level?
Based on your experience and the review linked above, I would wager using raw and batch processing them with fully automated rendering in post-production would be more successful and convenient than using the D850 Negative Digitizer.