Digilux 2 ?

The D2 is a brilliant camera. Looks and operation almost like a regular M.
The lens is great and fast. The whole package is lightweight.
Sharpness, colour and contrast are great. I use the camera only in jpeg because the raw is sooo slow. But the in-camera jpegs are great. Settings for lower or saturation and contrast and such.
Biggest disadvantage is the small sensor, with little possibility of creating shallow dof.
But if you manage to get bokeh, it is beautiful.
Macro capability is limited.
Low ISO is very limited. Noise appears already slightly at 200. I only use higher ISO in BW, then the noise is like film grain.

All in all a nice, relatively compact and lightweight camera. And dead silent!
 
I think laptoprob did a fine job in describing the Digilux 2. I love mine. It ceratinly has limits like all cameras. When used within those limits it's an excellent performer. My only issue with the camera is strictly a personal one and it's that I hate the evf. I just wish Leica/Panasonic would have opted for an optical vf.

Best regards,

Bob
 
Digilux 2

Digilux 2

I had one for a few years and recently looked at some photos from that camera and was stunned how clear and rich they are, especially on close-up or medium shots of people. It did remarkably well on trips to Italy. Friends thought I was showing them postcards. It does not perform very well in low light situations but the flash is good once you learn how to use it. I recommend it.
 
I had the Panasonic version - the LC1. Like others have said, great for everything except high ISO. I never used it past 100.
I recently sold it because I use my film cameras much more often and prefer the film workflow to digital workflow. The sale allowed me to purchase my very first brand-new Leica item, the Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 ASPH!
 
Back
Top Bottom