Jerevan
Recycled User
Hello,
I am slowly getting my home darkroom together.
I have been googling and searching, but to no avail - does anyone know if halogen lights for a Durst 305 CLS are still manufactured?
If worst comes to worst, I can always put that enlarger in the dumpster and go back to my old Gnome...
I am slowly getting my home darkroom together.
I have been googling and searching, but to no avail - does anyone know if halogen lights for a Durst 305 CLS are still manufactured?
If worst comes to worst, I can always put that enlarger in the dumpster and go back to my old Gnome...
Jerevan
Recycled User
greyhoundman said:Check this list for cross reference.
http://donsbulbs.com/cgi-bin/r/t.pl/equipment.durst_usa_incorporated.html
Thanks! I checked the website, but it didn't turn up anything useful (as far as I could gather). I suppose I have to take the halogen light out of the enlarger and measure it.
x-ray
Veteran
I have the floor model Laborator 138S and have problems with bulbs. Try glennview.com or Jensen-Optical @ 503 846-1429. Both are Durst suppliers and about the only source for parts. I found a replacement for the lamp in my 138S at www.topbulb.com
Durst is an excellent enlarger, don't toss it just rewire it.
Durst is an excellent enlarger, don't toss it just rewire it.
Jerevan
Recycled User
For future reference - I found a halogen bulb that works well and is about 5 times cheaper than the Durst original. Its name is Osram Xenophot, and goes under the designation PF6834, a 12v 100W GZ6.35 halogen bulb. These bulbs are EFP.
I couldn't find any exact information but the link for cross-reference given earlier in the thread, some measurements of the filament and some heavy-duty thinking gave me the lead-on. I will buy a supply of them. Thanks a lot for the help!
I couldn't find any exact information but the link for cross-reference given earlier in the thread, some measurements of the filament and some heavy-duty thinking gave me the lead-on. I will buy a supply of them. Thanks a lot for the help!
Share: