JPD
Retina and Rollei user
I respectfully disagree, it's a subject that has been disscused to death. The lens diagram shown differs significantly from my particular sample.
I would also check the lens serial n., since many early 3.5F Planar cameras have been factory upgraded to a six element Planar - as in my Rolleiflex TLR.
Can you show us your 3,5F and its Planar? I doubt that owners had their Rolleiflexes upgraded with a six element lens. That would have been very expensive for minimal gain.
I emailed Carl Zeiss and asked about the reason behind the redesign of the 3,5/75 Planar to a six element one. This is the reply I got:
Dear Patric,
Thank you for your inquiry to Carl Zeiss.
Well, the reason for the change of the lens design was an improve of the lens performance (less vignetting, more consistent performance across the image field) as well as an easier production. The splitting of the second lens element into two cemented elements with a plain surface in between is easier in production than the meniscus element.
Hoping to be of service to you we kindly ask you to contact us again should you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Bertram Hoenlinger
That is an impressive level of customer service in response to an enquiry about a legacy product. Thanks for passing the information on, too.Thank you for your inquiry to Carl Zeiss.
Well, the reason for the change of the lens design was an improve of the lens performance (less vignetting, more consistent performance across the image field) as well as an easier production. The splitting of the second lens element into two cemented elements with a plain surface in between is easier in production than the meniscus element.
Hoping to be of service to you we kindly ask you to contact us again should you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Bertram Hoenlinger
Regards,
Brett
D.O'K.
Darren O'Keeffe.
Thanks JPD for taking the time to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D.
Regards,
D.
rlouzan
Well-known
Hi,
I'll see if I can post a picture over the weekend. From the Serial numbers Mark James Small confirmed to me that it was a factory upgrade.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
I'll see if I can post a picture over the weekend. From the Serial numbers Mark James Small confirmed to me that it was a factory upgrade.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
Can you show us your 3,5F and its Planar? I doubt that owners had their Rolleiflexes upgraded with a six element lens. That would have been very expensive for minimal gain.
rlouzan
Well-known
rlouzan
Well-known
Rear element, Rollei 3.5F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
Attachments
JPD
Retina and Rollei user
Riouzan, that's the antireflection coating. Is the front element purplish?
The Planar on my 3,5F has the warm coating on the front element and the rear element has a purplish coating.
Here you can see a 2,8F with the warm coating on the front element:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_1._large.JPG
And this has the purplish coating:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_2__2476704_front_view_no_cap.jpg
This was before multicoating, so the explanation may be that the warm and cold coatings would cancel each other out.
The Planar on my 3,5F has the warm coating on the front element and the rear element has a purplish coating.
Here you can see a 2,8F with the warm coating on the front element:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_1._large.JPG
And this has the purplish coating:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_2__2476704_front_view_no_cap.jpg
This was before multicoating, so the explanation may be that the warm and cold coatings would cancel each other out.
rlouzan
Well-known
Hi JPD,
Taking lens SN 2.986.XXX:
*Front element exhibits both a magenta and orange multi coating 'of sorts'.
*Rear element is orange-yellow, similar to the color cast of a radioactive Summicron, could be lens coating ...
However, this still doesn't explain why the rear element is completely flat, not even close to the lens cut shown in #15.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
Taking lens SN 2.986.XXX:
*Front element exhibits both a magenta and orange multi coating 'of sorts'.
*Rear element is orange-yellow, similar to the color cast of a radioactive Summicron, could be lens coating ...
However, this still doesn't explain why the rear element is completely flat, not even close to the lens cut shown in #15.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
Riouzan, that's the antireflection coating. Is the front element purplish?
The Planar on my 3,5F has the warm coating on the front element and the rear element has a purplish coating.
Here you can see a 2,8F with the warm coating on the front element:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_1._large.JPG
And this has the purplish coating:
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/2.8F_type_2__2476704_front_view_no_cap.jpg
This was before multicoating, so the explanation may be that the warm and cold coatings would cancel each other out.
JPD
Retina and Rollei user
Hi JPD,
Taking lens SN 2.986.XXX:
*Front element exhibits both a magenta and orange multi coating 'of sorts'.
*Rear element is orange-yellow, similar to the color cast of a radioactive Summicron, could be lens coating ...
However, this still doesn't explain why the rear element is completely flat, not even close to the lens cut shown in #15.
The rear element is less curved than the front element, but the reason to why it looks flat is the angle you're looking from. You can't look at it from the side when it's deep inside the camera, and it will probably also feel flat if you touch it with a finger (don't, that's unecessary!). You can cut a ca 2 cm piece of thick paper and hold it with a pair of tweezers against the lens surface and see that it's not exactly flat.
I took a picture of mine, and it does look "flat", but you can see the reflections from my lightsource that they bend a little.

rlouzan
Well-known
JPD,
You've convinced me!
I wonder if they changed the lens coating at some point.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
You've convinced me!
I wonder if they changed the lens coating at some point.
Regards,
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: Hand Made Leather Camera Wrist Straps
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...a-wrist-straps
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.