Ektar 100

[Vics]

Sisters by Vic Stewart, on Flickr

 

[wjlapier]

Fujifilm GA645

Fujifilm GA645



Soon another trip to Cannon Beach with a GS645 this time and more Ektar.

 

[grouchos_tash]

Leica M6 - Elmar-M 50mm 2003 - Ektar


Untitled by Gary Harding, on Flickr

Bessa R2a - Nokton 40mm f1.4 - Ektar


Untitled by Gary Harding, on Flickr

Leica IIIf - Elmar 5cm f3.5 - Ektar


Italy by Gary Harding, on Flickr

 

[luuca]

and works with subdued light too! ��

 

[markjwyatt]

Here are some shots with my Contax IIa + 50mm f2 Sonnar:


Bare Hill by Mark Wyatt, on Flickr


Pasture Old Oak by Mark Wyatt, on Flickr


Pastoral and Suburban by Mark Wyatt, on Flickr

 

[skopar steve]

I don't shoot color film often, but I really like Ektar 100.

Teacher by Steve Belden, on Flickr

 

[charjohncarter]

First Six Camera, Ektar 100 120:

Ektar100 by John Carter, on Flickr

 

[Mackinaw]

Yashica Mat 124G. Ektar 100.

Jim B.

 

[coogee]

I like Ektar too, especially on cloudier days.

 

[Ted Striker]

I gave up on Ektar film once it became so hard to find. I could not buy a roll anywhere during my last trip to Japan. 2 weeks in the country and all the film I found was either Superia or AgfaPhoto Vista. I should have brought the Ektar that I wanted to shoot but I figured Japan was THE easiest country in the world to buy film in, I would have no problem. Lesson learned.

 

[lawrence]

La Paz, Bolivia

La Paz, Bolivia

Ektar 100. Canon L1 with Voigtlander 35/1.7 Ultron.

 

[Mackinaw]

People say Ektar is too warm to use for portraits, but I still like it. Probably my favorite C41 film.

Jim B.

 

[css9450]

I use it from time to time, after a lifetime of shooting slides exclusively when I wanted to do color.

 

[Swift1]

Ektar is probably my all time favorite film. It handles over/under exposure better than any film I've used. I've exposed it anywhere from 25 ISO to 640 ISO, processed normally, and usually get excellent results.

This was shot at around 25 ISO (I almost never use a meter, just Sunny 16),

Rolleiflex 2.8C
Carl Zeiss Planar 80/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500​

 

[Swift1]

This one was (somewhat accidentally) shot at 640 ISO. I had manually set my Contax G2 to 640 ISO for a roll of Lomo Color 800, and then forgot to reset it when I loaded Ektar, and I didn't realize what I had done until I got the developed negatives back from the lab.

Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Kodak Ektar 100 @iso640
Epson V750​

 

[Bingley]

Nikkormat FT3, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Ektar:

Manzanita by bingley0522, on Flickr

Apples by bingley0522, on Flickr

Calaveras County, CA by bingley0522, on Flickr

A road over the hill by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[Majki]

@pulp_picture

 

[Majki]

@pulp_picture

 

[charjohncarter]

I'm not as brave as Swift1: this one was at 50 EI. Also this is when Ektar 100 was first on the market around 2008. One observation, depending on how you scan and post process you can get different color renditions.

Everyone hear should read Swift1's tutorial on color scanning and post processing:

http://www.coltonallen.com/getting-the-most-from-color-negative-film-with-your-epson-flatbed/

Untitled by John Carter, on Flickr

 

[Swift1]

I'm not as brave as Swift1: this one was at 50 EI. Also this is when Ektar 100 was first on the market around 2008. One observation, depending on how you scan and post process you can get different color renditions.

Everyone hear should read Swift1's tutorial on color scanning and post processing:

http://www.coltonallen.com/getting-the-most-from-color-negative-film-with-your-epson-flatbed/

Thanks for sharing that link again John

Here's one I shot at around 200 ISO.

Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Pentax 67
S-M-C Takumar 6X7 105/2.4
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500​