whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
Another option available to use ANR glass with the Epson film holder. Comes in 35 and 120.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/18134894098...eName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
http://www.ebay.com/itm/18134894098...eName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
f16sunshine
Moderator
Thanks for the HU.
Cheers!
Cheers!
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
That's a nice price. Thanks!
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
Of course, we can buy the glass only and not the holder. Big advantage.
f16sunshine
Moderator
I ordered a pair. Will report my experience in this thread. Thanks again for the heads up 
VTHokiEE
Well-known
I assume the 35mm inserts will work on a V500 as well?
Dave S.
Well-known
I emailed the seller and asked if these would work with the Epson V600 and he replied that as far as he knew the channel sizes for the film in both scanners is identical - so the answer would be 'yes'.
lynnb
Veteran
this looks very promising. I'll wait to read Andy's evaluation before I purchase. Thanks for the heads up!
Harry S.
Well-known
Thanks! Just bought two.
James1
Established
An alternative ANR Glass inset is the ScanAssist:
http://www.scanassist.org/
Cost EUR10 plus postage - also a good price IMO. I have one and it works well.
http://www.scanassist.org/
Cost EUR10 plus postage - also a good price IMO. I have one and it works well.
froyd
Veteran
An alternative ANR Glass inset is the ScanAssist:
http://www.scanassist.org/
Cost EUR10 plus postage - also a good price IMO. I have one and it works well.
If not too burdensome, would you mind posting a before and after? I would trust an RFFer's input much more than the examples provided by the manufacturer.
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
I just got one of the 120 ANR glass pieces mentioned below for 120 and gave it a quick test today. I did not have the time I needed to get really detailed but here is what I found so far.
I have the 35mm glass from Better Scanning and they are fine. They seem to be ever so slightly thicker than the new 120. BS seems to have a more rounded edge not that the new one is sharp or poses a problem. The glass is big enough and heavy enough to keep the 120 films flat. I scanned some film with the Epson software at 3200 (Zeiss Nettar 6x6 – 52MB ea) and one with Vuescan, (Fuji GF 670 – 6x7 is big) using Chris Crawfords notes at 6400. (Thanks, Chris.)
I took them into Photoshop and adjusted as needed. My conclusion is this…. They serve the purpose very well. Flat film and a really good scan. Definitely better than the Epson film holder alone. I blew up the negs in PS and I was really surprised at the detail. Recommended. A good solution without having to buy a new film holder.
I have the 35mm glass from Better Scanning and they are fine. They seem to be ever so slightly thicker than the new 120. BS seems to have a more rounded edge not that the new one is sharp or poses a problem. The glass is big enough and heavy enough to keep the 120 films flat. I scanned some film with the Epson software at 3200 (Zeiss Nettar 6x6 – 52MB ea) and one with Vuescan, (Fuji GF 670 – 6x7 is big) using Chris Crawfords notes at 6400. (Thanks, Chris.)
I took them into Photoshop and adjusted as needed. My conclusion is this…. They serve the purpose very well. Flat film and a really good scan. Definitely better than the Epson film holder alone. I blew up the negs in PS and I was really surprised at the detail. Recommended. A good solution without having to buy a new film holder.
Dave S.
Well-known
An alternative ANR Glass inset is the ScanAssist:
http://www.scanassist.org/
Cost EUR10 plus postage - also a good price IMO. I have one and it works well.
I considered getting the Scan Assist product, but decided to go with the one mentioned in the initial post of this thread (from * bay seller "hi*tech*glass"). I'm waiting for their product to arrive in the mail (35mm and 120mm versions).
PLEASE NOTE: I mentioned the Scan Assist product when corresponding with the Alex from hi*tech*glass. He replied that he was aware of their product and would match their price for myself and any other RFF members.
I'll be sure to repost after I receive the ANR glass and try some scans with it.
edmelvins
Beardless User
Any update for this? I've been thinking of getting a V700 but its lack of image quality kind of puts me off. But if this improves it, then I'll reconsider the V700.
f16sunshine
Moderator
Any update for this? I've been thinking of getting a V700 but its lack of image quality kind of puts me off. But if this improves it, then I'll reconsider the V700.
Not yet sorry... It arrived quickly and looks good but... no use to report yet.
maddoc
... likes film again.
Could somebody provide a comparison between 120 film mounted into filmholder + ANR glass and film on scanner glass plate + ANR glass? The optics used by the scanner will be different and therefore the specified resolution but I would be very interested into a real world comparison.
lynnb
Veteran
Whitecat - thanks for your notes. A quick question: did you have the emulsion side up or down? I find my 120 film bows up towards the shiny side so I will have to mount it emulsion facing the scanner glass if I use the ANR glass to flatten it.
froyd
Veteran
Also interested in seeing 35mm before and after comparison.
Filzkoeter
stray animal
35mm
Epson V500
ANR glass (from a cheap picture frame, cost: 5€) used for the second sample (and scanned without holder directly from the glass, emulsion side down). It's how I do all my scanning.
No sharpening here:
That was the whole photo:
Epson V500
ANR glass (from a cheap picture frame, cost: 5€) used for the second sample (and scanned without holder directly from the glass, emulsion side down). It's how I do all my scanning.
No sharpening here:

That was the whole photo:

froyd
Veteran
Thanks Miko-
Any noticeable improvement in prints?
Any noticeable improvement in prints?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.