Epson Perfection V700 PHOTO scanner

xpandebt@9%

BLARP?!
Local time
2:47 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
50
Before I start on-topic, I would just like to say "thanks" to this forum and it's members. I scoured online sources for research on the xpan and xpan II for months, and this forum was by far the most helpful. Most searches I made included a post or more from this website. And now, take note of my username. You are all to blame!

So, I went waaaaaay too far into debt, and now I'm thinking of adding a little more. My local photo places are woefully inadequate to scan xpan slide film. We tried the experimental flatbed (seriously bad), and then I heard from a CA-based XPan-Approved print shopt that the Frontier system the local shop uses won't work because they tried it (they said, "good luck with that..."), and they had a custom tray made for their other-brand machines, or some such thing. So I could either play the glacial-mail game, or I could simply buy a scanner and scan them myself (which will be cheaper in the long-run anyway, so long as quality is comparable).

I am thinking of buying the Epson Perfection V700 PHOTO scanner. Since it is brand-spankin' new this month, and as I said above, I never buy anything without doing my homework first, I would like to know: which one of you is a technophile and already has this scanner?

Who can tell me how it works (does it?) with the super-wide xpan format?

How many frames per scan?

Is the quality comparable (better/worse) to a professional feed-scanner or drum-scanner?

Is it wiser to get the V750 Pro for the wet-mount capabilities when dealing with super-curly slide film?

What's the down side of this scanner (if any)?

I can tell who the pro's are on this forum, and being a wea-newbie-self-taught photographer, I would GREATLY appreciate your wisdom to be bestowed upon me.

Thanks again.

P.S. I will definitely add to the gallery once I jump the obvious hurdle. And, I read in another thread that people were not confident that there are others out there who actually use the 30 mm lense- I went for broke (literally), and I can say my collection of all three lenses are all uniquely qualified for my varied photographic visions. The 30 mm on film is wider than the mega-wide viewfinder!
 
I would wait for the V750 Pro. Even though the V700 seems very nice. If the V750 is just a little better it will be worth 2-300 USD's more. I think it will be better because it will use better optics. Something that's not usually found in flatbeds. So wait for the V750 with better optics, better software and wet-mount..
 
Ukko Heikkinen said:

Thanks for that review page! Took me all afternoon to get through it. That is the most comprehensive one I have seen yet. It will definitely stay on my favorites, even after I buy the scanner (leaning towards this one now more than ever) because it has some really great tips about optimizing the scanner's capabilities.

About the previous comment, I think the V750 is already selling online, but I figure that I'm not quite the pro that will demand that level of quality just yet (emphasis on "yet"). The only thing I would regret not getting that one for at this point is the anti-reflection coating on the glass. I clearly understand the benefit of that feature, and I am generally enough of a technophile to spring for the added bonus. However, I figure that once I have used the V700 for a while, I can always sell that one and upgrade to the V750 when I am more capable of appreciating its better qualities. It sounds like these two models are high enough quality that they'll be around for a while.

😕 The only quesion that I am left with is in regard to the xpan format. I am wondering if the software will automatically recognize the wide format 35mm frames for the thumbnail preview scans, when scanning-in strips.

By the way, if anybody else is considering purchasing this scanner, I found (through a Google search) a nearly $50 cheaper price than MSRP from Epson on this website store: www.costcentral.com. That was for the V700, not including $15 shipping. The V750 is more than $60 cheaper, and includes free shipping. I'm not the type to advertise for a product, save for what I think are great deals. Let me know if you find a better price!
 
750 pro

750 pro

I have a 750 pro on order and will let you know how it stacks up against a high end Epson Flatbed and a nice 35mm dedicated scanner (stiched) as well as a pro drum scan.
 
quigley13 said:
I have a 750 pro on order and will let you know how it stacks up against a high end Epson Flatbed and a nice 35mm dedicated scanner (stiched) as well as a pro drum scan.

Thanks! I would love to hear your opinion of the scanner compared to those others. The 750 PRO with the wet mount and the anti-glare glass is supposed to be the cat's meow. However, I just recieved my very own 700 PHOTO model just a couple of days ago!

My only complaint so far :bang: is that it arrived with a chunk of shmegma under the cover glass where I cannot clean it! It shows up on my scans (only one frame) like some blurry alien spacecraft on the horizon of my landscape shots! ICE does not work on it at the speed or quality level. I'll be calling up Epson, or at least the company I bought it from on Monday to settle up. Other than that accident, the scanner seems to work like a charm.

I am certainly no professional, so I wouldn't really know the difference between a good scan or bad, but the online review above was a MAJOR eye opener for me. I can't say I have acquired the same quality of scan when zooming-in to 400% like they did, but I went straight to 3.5mm's on the risers out of the box and have not yet compared 3.0 or 2.5mm's to see if the image sharpens up.

I answered my own question above about the auto function. In short- it doesn't work for xpan users. I will always have to scan my slides with auto off. It does function, it just cuts them in half-plus sizes so you get 5 standard-sized slides from three xpan frames (it apparently doesn't have enough of the last -3rd- xpan frame to justify adding the last bit of the last -6th- slide, cutting out nearly half of the last half-frame).

I attached an example shot that I was working on- at least I think it attached; 1st timer for that on here. This one was a 1200 dpi scan with low USM and speed ICE from the scanner, and no photo alteration in PS. Tell me what you think! (But don't call unless you want to buy it! 😀 )

I would love to see an example of your 750 PRO scan, if you don't mind. I am really interested in the comparison with a drum scan, since the review didn't directly do so.
 

Attachments

  • Experimental2.jpg
    Experimental2.jpg
    217.3 KB · Views: 0
I have the Epson 4870 photo scanner, which I think was the model before the 4990.
I recently scanned a bunch of Xpan film and noticed that the 35mm strip film holder doesn't hold the negs flat.
The two center strips of the holder are the particularly bad; the clips on the edge strips work a little better. I also had a hard time keeping the film straight.
The flimsy construction of the film holders are also mentioned in the photo-i UK review of the V700 and the picture of strip holder looks exactly like mine.

I've been thinking of a work-around for holding the film flat, or trying the stitch method with my Nikon V film scanner. Anyone else have a problem with the holders? Its a bit frustrating to have nice sharp negs and not be able to get a sharp scan..
 
ERV said:
Anyone else have a problem with the holders?

I know what you mean. One solution that I found was by accident. Since I had to wait a few weeks for the V700 to become available, my slide film was sitting in the developer's envelope during that time. Previously, the film was highly curled, but the wait flattened it right out. Yes, the holders are flimsy. However, I was still impressed with the scan quality in the review. The only other solution I can think of now is to buy an after-market film holder that is constructed better.

Anybody else have any better solution?
 
If I remember correctly elsewhere at RFF there was a discussion of an aftermarket manufacturer of holders designed to deal with these issues and I believe it was for both 35 and 120. Check the archives.
 
I may be wrong, but the stripholder offered at betterscanning.com is only available for 120/220 film, not for 35mm.
Even inserting strips into the original 35mm stripholder makes me crasy!

Wim
 
wdenies said:
I may be wrong, but the stripholder offered at betterscanning.com is only available for 120/220 film, not for 35mm.
Even inserting strips into the original 35mm stripholder makes me crasy!

Wim

You are correct.
I think I'll email better scanning and ask if they would make a true xpan 35mm holder.. I would be willing to be the demo guy..
 
I just received my v700 and i find the 35mm carrier to be utter junk. This is very frustrating since I am a digital guy just trying out film with my xpan and I am not getting results close to my cheapo oly e-300 and not even close to my Nikon D200 in terms of sharpness. The film needs something substancial to hold it flat. I would love to find a glass carrier or something similar.
 
ERV said:
You are correct.
I think I'll email better scanning and ask if they would make a true xpan 35mm holder.. I would be willing to be the demo guy..

It's not convenient, but you can attach a 35mm strip with 3M sticky tape to the anti-newton glass they sell for their MF film holder. The glass will hold the film flat. See:

http://www.betterscanning.com/scanning/usinginsert.html
 
I bought a 750 a few days ago. Very impressed. Here's one of my first scans of my camera-gear-authoriser, Helen.

Looks like I used a grad, but I honestly didn't, the clouds just looked that way.

helen_rf_800.jpg
 
Attention all Xpan scanners:

>35mm strip film holder doesn't hold the negs flat

I have a Xpan specific film holder under development that I hope to bring to market in the new year.

I have yet to find a satisfactory scanning solution for my Xpan film so I have decided to create one.

The holder will work on Epson scanners and will be guaranteed to hold film as flat as possible (without using troublesome glass holders).

Mine will be a very low volumn operation but if you are interested in my XpanScan holder, drop me an email and I'll keep you informed of my progress,

My email: ausdlk(at)gmail.com
 
Back
Top Bottom