ZeissFan
Veteran
I found another three 100-foot spools of Agfapan APX 400 in my office while doing a major cleanup/purge, so I guess I have five 100-foot spools of this film. I like APX 400 for an all-purpose emulsion.
For other purposes, I like Tri-X and also the new TMax 400.
For other purposes, I like Tri-X and also the new TMax 400.
taskoni
Well-known
XP2 it is.
Regards,
b.
Regards,
b.
chrismoret
RF-addict
Tri-X in soaked D-76 or Rodinal. It's not a very sexy combination but it gives predictable results. 
efirmage
Established
Some of my favorite shots that are not mine are TriX. Seems to be a beautiful film, but I just can't seem to get the results I want with it. Should probably try more.
I shoot TMax 400 (and 100) for my BW needs.
I shoot TMax 400 (and 100) for my BW needs.
mob81
Well-known
ilford Delta 400 for me. Great result with Kodak D-76 and it dries flat and easy to scan.
Tompas
Wannabe Künstler
Kodak BW400CN.
spartacus
Member
I use Arista Premium 400 (TriX) or Ilford PanF Plus when I need a slow film, both in bulk rolls and developed semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD.
Dana B.
Well-known
I am digging Arista Premium 400, which is rebadged Tri-X, souped in D76 1:1 or Tmax. I need to order some more from freestyle soon ...
I agree. The Arista DX400 (Tri-X) and D-76 is superb. I also love Tri-X 120/D-76 for the same reason. I've tried a few off-brand substitutes, and no comparison.
NLewis
Established
I got back some Arista Premium 400 and it is WAY grungier than the Tri-X I was using before. It does have that "vietnam photojournalist" look though. AP could possibly (also) be OLD Tri-X, the original formula, which was changed not too long ago.
f16sunshine
Moderator
I got back some Arista Premium 400 and it is WAY grungier than the Tri-X I was using before. It does have that "vietnam photojournalist" look though. AP could possibly (also) be OLD Tri-X, the original formula, which was changed not too long ago.
Development plays a big role. If you send it out there is no control. Best to do it yourself.
dmc
Bessa Driver
Tri X in D76.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Tri-X for me in Rodinal. Working my way through some HP5, no opinion yet.
I love TX for it's versatility and consistency. I always know what I'm going to get and I like the classic look, though I tend to develop to limit grain a bit.
I love TX for it's versatility and consistency. I always know what I'm going to get and I like the classic look, though I tend to develop to limit grain a bit.
imhere
Peter
My favorite 400 is Tri X, Fuji 400, HP 5 and process in Rodinal I:50 or I:100
rogerzilla
Well-known
Kodak BW400CN (ideally rated at ISO 200, although you can go to ISO 400 or even ISO 1600 on the same roll) knocks the others into a cocked hat. If you want the grain and acutance of a traditional silver film, Neopan 400. The current formulation of Tri-X is very disappointing, and I understand it's not the same film it was in the 1980s.
Paterson Aculux for the silver films, BW400CN is C-41.
Paterson Aculux for the silver films, BW400CN is C-41.
TaoPhoto
Documentary Photographer
My favorite remains Tri-X. I like the old formula better than the current one, but it's still the most flexible B&W film out there. On the other hand, I've been shooting a lot of C-41 B&W lately (Ilford, mostly, some Kodak), and really enjoying the simplicity of it.
StenSture
Hans
My favourite 400 ASA allways was Ilford HP5 souped in Tetenal's Neofine. Does Neofine exist nowdays? Oh, <sigh> those were the days.. Now I'm getting nostalgic.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Does Neofine exist nowdays?
Neofin Blue (basically pre-made Beutler developer using pyrocatechin) is still made:
http://www.tetenal.com/index_c.htm?AKT=01120010003000200010&L=UK
Neofin Red, I think,may be gone. There are some speed increasing non-solvent developers in Anchell and Troop that would be a decent substitute.
Marty
DNG
Film Friendly
Just starting shooting Fuji Neopan 400 in Rodinal 1:50..
My 1st roll, I screwed up..I got workable results.. (thin and less contrast).. I used 5ml for 10oz instead if 6ml for 10oz, and then used 21c instead of 22c for the time chart. :bang:
But my 2nd roll was perfect... great contrast and great sharpness. This film has nice tight grain with high resolution. I shot it at ISO 320 though, w/o adjusting the time...
So, now I shoot it at ISO 320 and develop as the 400 times.
@Bob M: I am loving the G1/45

My 1st roll, I screwed up..I got workable results.. (thin and less contrast).. I used 5ml for 10oz instead if 6ml for 10oz, and then used 21c instead of 22c for the time chart. :bang:
But my 2nd roll was perfect... great contrast and great sharpness. This film has nice tight grain with high resolution. I shot it at ISO 320 though, w/o adjusting the time...
So, now I shoot it at ISO 320 and develop as the 400 times.
@Bob M: I am loving the G1/45
paulfish4570
Veteran
hp5 now. longer tonal range for the way i do things than ap400/tri-x. and the film stock dries almost FLAT, and is long-axis completely flat after a couple of hours rolled backwards in a film can. tri-x/ap400 never goes as flat.
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
1. 2TMY
2. (tied) HP5+, Neopan 400
4. Tri-X
Wouldn't complain about shooting any of 'em.
Haven't used Delta 400. I bet it's really good, too.
2. (tied) HP5+, Neopan 400
4. Tri-X
Wouldn't complain about shooting any of 'em.
Haven't used Delta 400. I bet it's really good, too.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.