Favourite 400 speed B+W film?

Favourite 400 speed B+W film?

  • Kodak TriX 400

    Votes: 858 41.1%
  • Kodak TMAX 400

    Votes: 238 11.4%
  • Ilford Delta 400

    Votes: 138 6.6%
  • Ilford HP5 Plus 400

    Votes: 636 30.4%
  • Efke KB400

    Votes: 12 0.6%
  • Fomapan 400

    Votes: 38 1.8%
  • Fuji Neopan 400

    Votes: 328 15.7%
  • Rollei R3 400

    Votes: 15 0.7%
  • Forte Fortepan 400

    Votes: 2 0.1%
  • Arista EDU Ultra 400

    Votes: 22 1.1%
  • Arista II 400

    Votes: 9 0.4%
  • Another unlisted 400

    Votes: 112 5.4%

  • Total voters
    2,090
I found another three 100-foot spools of Agfapan APX 400 in my office while doing a major cleanup/purge, so I guess I have five 100-foot spools of this film. I like APX 400 for an all-purpose emulsion.

For other purposes, I like Tri-X and also the new TMax 400.
 
Some of my favorite shots that are not mine are TriX. Seems to be a beautiful film, but I just can't seem to get the results I want with it. Should probably try more.

I shoot TMax 400 (and 100) for my BW needs.
 
I use Arista Premium 400 (TriX) or Ilford PanF Plus when I need a slow film, both in bulk rolls and developed semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD.
 
I am digging Arista Premium 400, which is rebadged Tri-X, souped in D76 1:1 or Tmax. I need to order some more from freestyle soon ...

I agree. The Arista DX400 (Tri-X) and D-76 is superb. I also love Tri-X 120/D-76 for the same reason. I've tried a few off-brand substitutes, and no comparison.
 
I got back some Arista Premium 400 and it is WAY grungier than the Tri-X I was using before. It does have that "vietnam photojournalist" look though. AP could possibly (also) be OLD Tri-X, the original formula, which was changed not too long ago.
 
I got back some Arista Premium 400 and it is WAY grungier than the Tri-X I was using before. It does have that "vietnam photojournalist" look though. AP could possibly (also) be OLD Tri-X, the original formula, which was changed not too long ago.

Development plays a big role. If you send it out there is no control. Best to do it yourself.
 
Tri-X for me in Rodinal. Working my way through some HP5, no opinion yet.

I love TX for it's versatility and consistency. I always know what I'm going to get and I like the classic look, though I tend to develop to limit grain a bit.
 
Kodak BW400CN (ideally rated at ISO 200, although you can go to ISO 400 or even ISO 1600 on the same roll) knocks the others into a cocked hat. If you want the grain and acutance of a traditional silver film, Neopan 400. The current formulation of Tri-X is very disappointing, and I understand it's not the same film it was in the 1980s.

Paterson Aculux for the silver films, BW400CN is C-41.
 
My favorite remains Tri-X. I like the old formula better than the current one, but it's still the most flexible B&W film out there. On the other hand, I've been shooting a lot of C-41 B&W lately (Ilford, mostly, some Kodak), and really enjoying the simplicity of it.
 
My favourite 400 ASA allways was Ilford HP5 souped in Tetenal's Neofine. Does Neofine exist nowdays? Oh, <sigh> those were the days.. Now I'm getting nostalgic.
 
Just starting shooting Fuji Neopan 400 in Rodinal 1:50..

My 1st roll, I screwed up..I got workable results.. (thin and less contrast).. I used 5ml for 10oz instead if 6ml for 10oz, and then used 21c instead of 22c for the time chart. :bang:

But my 2nd roll was perfect... great contrast and great sharpness. This film has nice tight grain with high resolution. I shot it at ISO 320 though, w/o adjusting the time...

So, now I shoot it at ISO 320 and develop as the 400 times.

@Bob M: I am loving the G1/45 :D:cool:
 
hp5 now. longer tonal range for the way i do things than ap400/tri-x. and the film stock dries almost FLAT, and is long-axis completely flat after a couple of hours rolled backwards in a film can. tri-x/ap400 never goes as flat.
 
1. 2TMY
2. (tied) HP5+, Neopan 400
4. Tri-X

Wouldn't complain about shooting any of 'em.

Haven't used Delta 400. I bet it's really good, too.
 
Back
Top Bottom