Film vs Digital – A Photo Comparison

[xayraa33]

Interesting read here:

https://thedarkroom.com/film-vs-digital-comparison/

 

[Ko.Fe.]

We have dedicated sub-forum for those who still finds it interesting.


https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=158

 

[Bill Clark]

Here we are, on the topic again.

But I do like my iPhone!

 

[oldwino]

The author lost my confidence when he started talking about “120mm” film.

 

[maigo]

The author lost my confidence when he started talking about “120mm” film.

Good rant about the same here:

https://emulsive.org/articles/rants/theres-no-such-thing-as-120mm-film


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DougK]

Interesting read here:

https://thedarkroom.com/film-vs-digital-comparison/

I'm not going to say either film or digital is better because that's a fool's game and it's the wrong question anyway. What I will say is that if you're producing flat JPEGs like that sample image from a high-end digital camera (and not shooting RAW for conversion later), then you really need to spend some time learning how to use your camera's configuration and JPEG processing settings to your best advantage.

 

[stephaneb]

The article linked in the original post is not good, really. the whole question is akin to asking if oil painting is better than water-colours.