xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
We have dedicated sub-forum for those who still finds it interesting.
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=158
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=158
Bill Clark
Veteran
Here we are, on the topic again.
But I do like my iPhone!
But I do like my iPhone!
oldwino
Well-known
The author lost my confidence when he started talking about “120mm” film.
maigo
Well-known
Good rant about the same here:
https://emulsive.org/articles/rants/theres-no-such-thing-as-120mm-film
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DougK
This space left blank
I'm not going to say either film or digital is better because that's a fool's game and it's the wrong question anyway. What I will say is that if you're producing flat JPEGs like that sample image from a high-end digital camera (and not shooting RAW for conversion later), then you really need to spend some time learning how to use your camera's configuration and JPEG processing settings to your best advantage.
stephaneb
Established
The article linked in the original post is not good, really. the whole question is akin to asking if oil painting is better than water-colours.