Fine grain bulk film

_lou_

Established
Local time
12:45 PM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
127
I have a question for the film experts out there.
A few months ago I started shooting 35mm film again, after using medium format a lot.
This is mostly due to the appeal of lighter weight and less conspicuous gear, but also my discovery if Fuji's Acros 100. There is so much detail in a frame that it does not feel too restricted compared to 6x6. I develop in single-use developer LC29, which gives fine grain and scans well.

I also started bulk loading, because I find it a good way to reduce waste.

Unfortunately I cannot find Acros 100 in bulk in Europe. Options I have are mostly Ilford. I would like recommendations on a good developper for FP4+, because until now I did not find it so good looking or so fine grained. Delta 100 would be another option but is more expensive and the grain I find a bit "dry".
 
Last edited:
Pan F+. I bought 1500 feet of it, when Freestyle Photo closed-it-out at $12.99/roll.
Labeled Aristo, but it's definitely PanF+.

D-76/ID11, or PMK Pyro+ are my favorites with this one.
 
Thanks to all for the comments, very inspiring. Tmax 100 is rather scarce here and therefore super expensive.
The attempts I made at PanF were in medium format, and I must not have picked the best soup for it, since I found it all greyish and lacking contrast, and scanning very strangely, giving kind of "dry" texture. But I guess I need to try it again.

There are some lesser known options such as Rollei and Fomopan (and some Agfa remaining stock). I tried Kentmere, which is fairly good for the price, but really not as fine as Acros.

I agree that fine grain is overstated to some extent, but moving from medium format to 135 feels... scary somehow. I guess my main criteria is how the result look once scanned, and there seem to be unclear things happening at this stage. I just need to find one good recipe.
 
There are some lesser known options such as Rollei and Fomopan (and some Agfa remaining stock). I tried Kentmere, which is fairly good for the price, but really not as fine as Acros.

Foma 100 is a really excellent film (same as the Arista EDU 100 I mentioned)

If you're flatbed scanning, I doubt you'll come close to resolving the grain on any of the emulsions listed above.
 
6701998011_f93c49d45b_b.jpg


I find the ORWO UN 54 very good as a finer grain alternative. Rated at 100 iso it woks well in just about any MQ developer. In this case the D96 (Kodak's movie stock developer - similar to D76) and also gives you good, sharp negatives with Beutler developer.
Nikon S3 Olympic, Nikkor 35f1.8 2005 version. D96 @ 6 min.
Check "orwona.com" for more information. Cames in 400 ft rolls and also in 100ft rolls.
Anything slower than 100 iso gives me a bit of a problem as I mainly shoot handheld - and if the weather turns crappy - you are at the ragged edge of exposure and shutter speed!
 
6701998011_f93c49d45b_b.jpg


I find the ORWO UN 54 very good as a finer grain alternative. Rated at 100 iso it woks well in just about any MQ developer. In this case the D96 (Kodak's movie stock developer - similar to D76) and also gives you good, sharp negatives with Beutler developer.
Nikon S3 Olympic, Nikkor 35f1.8 2005 version. D96 @ 6 min.
Check "orwona.com" for more information. Cames in 400 ft rolls and also in 100ft rolls.
Anything slower than 100 iso gives me a bit of a problem as I mainly shoot handheld - and if the weather turns crappy - you are at the ragged edge of exposure and shutter speed!

I have 100 feet of this in the post can't wait, have you tried developing it in Rodinal ?
 
If you're flatbed scanning, I doubt you'll come close to resolving the grain on any of the emulsions listed above.

I'm not flatbed scanning, and neither am I looking to resolve the grain, quite the opposite in fact. What is good with Acros combined with my scanner, it that every pixel is a distinct grey value, as opposed to some other films which will produce a random (noisy) arrangement of black and white points. Post processing can be used to cure this to a certain extent, but at the cost of reduced details.
 
I thought I'd give an example.

Here is a full size detail of an Acros scan :
acros.jpg


and a similar scan from Kentmere 100 :

kentmere.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom