back alley
IMAGES
i have the preview setting to off...only ever shoot single shot and keep the af square centred...
An analogy would be to buy a machine gun, but only use it in single shot mode. Who does that?
Well, honestly Frank? Me. Ok, I'm prepared to be flamed here. 😉
I have only used the motor-drive function on a camera once... I've had them for years and shot sports for newspapers... but I only used it once: on a building implosion where I wanted a sequence of the collapse. BTW, the local newspaper (the second largest in the state) used my shots for that when all four of the fixed-point cameras they had set up failed.
Just because the camera has some miracle feature doesn't mean you should use it necessarily. I probably use my LCD more than I need to... but it's convenient. It also slows me down which can be good... or not depending on what I'm shooting. Invariably, the more you turn to automation, the more likely it is to fail when you need it the most; and the corollary to that is that the peak action always happens in between frames when you shoot on sequence. You're usually much better off to shoot manually and develop a sense of timing for the kind of shooting you're doing. Try different angles, lighting, and explore all the variables.. but absent specific requirements to the contrary, one or two frames per variation is sufficient.
Oh, and machine guns are a blast to shoot and the Thompson .45 really makes me grin... but the motto I taught my folks on the range was "one shot per bad guy."
Just say'n: if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. The features a tool has, influences (not determines) how it is used.
My point, Frank, is that a camera needs to have a shutter speed control, aperture control, some kind of focusing system, and a way to indicate sensitivity of the medium to light. Past that, everything else is fluff... sort of like keeping your proverbial hammer in a velvet-lined box. It's pretty, it's cool to know that you have it, but in the end it doesn't really help you drive the nail any straighter or faster. You still have to be competent in wielding the hammer. I think that gets lost in some of the whiz-bang techno stuff today.
My point, Frank, is that a camera needs to have a shutter speed control, aperture control, some kind of focusing system, and a way to indicate sensitivity of the medium to light. Past that, everything else is fluff... sort of like keeping your proverbial hammer in a velvet-lined box. It's pretty, it's cool to know that you have it, but in the end it doesn't really help you drive the nail any straighter or faster. You still have to be competent in wielding the hammer. I think that gets lost in some of the whiz-bang techno stuff today.
I never use FPS. NEVER... I don't need it.
Us old Marines are of the one well placed round mentality.
So you don't use motor drive settings, is that a good or a bad thing?
Can you tell if a photograph has been taken in a motor drive sequence, and if not, does it really then matter?
Likewise does not using FPS make you a better photographer, a superior technician? Why is this better.
Thats not it all. I am better without it. My choice. I don't look down on anyone for how they choose to work and with your post whose looking down on who...
Most of the work I do I don't get a second shot at it either.
IMO, its a whole different ball game when someone is paying you to get the shot.
Many disagreements happen when participants are arguing at cross purposes.
JEEZE shoot how you want. I'll shoot the way I shoot. It's OK it will all be video streams soon so all you will have to do is point the camera in the right direction and someone half the country away will be finding the moment. Where did you read I said anyone is inferior because of anything? I just mentioned my choice, why I work the way I do and what I prefer. Never said what should be right for anyone else or that you were less or more because you don't work the way I do.
I feed the family with this and have for several decades. See #82...
I have 4 billboards going up next month in the Chicago area. One of my clients recently received a huge national award for two of their publications that I shoot. I'm just part of the team. I also have an exhibit at a galley in Chicago of my personal work opening on March 6th so why shouldn't I mention it. I do it everyday in some way and I have reached a certain level of respect with both my professional work and my personal work.
This ties in and brings us back to topic. I value my work as do my clients and the people that buy my work when I exhibit. Life is short and if you don't value what you are creating then again what is the point?