julianphotoart
No likey digital-phooey
I'm sorry if this topic came up before; I don't recall seeing it. So, I'm a reader of Amateur Photographer, published in the U.K. For what seems like the last 6 months, every week's issue has letters about the sad state of affairs in the U.K. re the ability of minding-their-own-business amateur photographers to take photos in public places, especially photos that just happen to have kids in them -- all of this apparently arising out of fears that all photographers are paedophiles. Police stop them, hooligans assault them, and irate mothers threaten them. I'm from the U.K. but have been away for precious many years. What is the REAL state of affairs? Are AP readers over-sensitive? Is it only the U.K., or is this virus spreading across Europe? Has anyone in public office (i.e. Ken Livingston) PUBLICLY come out to say how ironic it is he wants to ban public photo-taking while appealing for photos involving the July bombings? I ask all this because this is the sort of thing that someone with an agend could get hold of in the U.S. and cause trouble.