RealXenuis
Officious Intermeddler
Ahh, makes sense. Although, single point in "zero" light is better than no point. I'd personally take it and be happy.
Agreed. One of the justifications I found for selling my DSLR to get a camera(s) that are likely slower in AF tracking (and in general) is that i almost never use tracking focus. I would say 95% of any action/motion series of shots I took with it were of my dog, which I feel confident the XP1 (or most cameras) will readily handle (I remember also a seal in Iceland, of which most of the shots were still fairly blurred).
While I can accept that IR AF as of now is single point, I can't imagine someone not being able to R&D that and come up with multi-point, cross type etc. Perhaps just expanding the spectrum sensitivity of the AF sensor (areas)? Well, that's someone else's job, but considering the types of technical issues that get sorted out nowadays, surely someone could figure that out??
Agreed. One of the justifications I found for selling my DSLR to get a camera(s) that are likely slower in AF tracking (and in general) is that i almost never use tracking focus. I would say 95% of any action/motion series of shots I took with it were of my dog, which I feel confident the XP1 (or most cameras) will readily handle (I remember also a seal in Iceland, of which most of the shots were still fairly blurred).
While I can accept that IR AF as of now is single point, I can't imagine someone not being able to R&D that and come up with multi-point, cross type etc. Perhaps just expanding the spectrum sensitivity of the AF sensor (areas)? Well, that's someone else's job, but considering the types of technical issues that get sorted out nowadays, surely someone could figure that out??
Ι think it's mostly the single point AF, people want many AF points.
RFs are single point by definition, so I'm not surprised the Hexar AF with its single point IR AF is so popular in this forum. Essentially it does what an RF does: focus in the centre of the image quickly and reliably regardless of lighting conditions. If somehow they managed to implement that in a an interdhangeable lens system I think it would be a major hit in our crowd. The problem is that our crowd is small, so I'm not sure if any manufacturer would want to eat the R&D costs for something like that just to sell it to 5% of the market. It's much easier to just add a couple of AF point in your CDAF/PDAF system and sell it to the masses as "the new Canon XVIIIII with 53 instead of 47 AF points!"