eleskin
Well-known
Fuji has stated that the X100 is the first of the X series cameras. There are also rumors that Fuji is working on an interchangeable lens version. For those of us who own M mount lenses or rangefinder lenses in general, the future looks like it will have more digital choices beyond the m8/M9. I would imagine Fuji will price such a camera way lower than the M9, perhaps in the $2000-$3000 USD range. I would also expect either full frame or a 1.3x crop similar to the M8.
I really hope the rumors will pan out to a real alternative choice to the M9. Dont get me wrong. The M9 is a great camera, but it is not cheap, and quite frankly, I would be happier spending my money on lenses and less on the camera. One thing is sure: The X100's high ISO looks to be superior to the M9, so if Fuji does make a version with a larger sensor and a lens mount for the M lenses, I would suspect Leica will not be happy. I believe that the pressure from a future M mount digital from Fuji or anyone else wil finally put pressure on Leica to make a digital full frame CL type camera at a significantly lower price than the M9.
Would a digital CL mbe a disaster for Leica? I dont think so! Leica should market their lenses more than the cameras. That is what I consider important in Leica. The glass!!!! Cameras are just a means to use the lens, and Leica makes the best in the world in many cases, and I do not mind paying real money for that. The camera is a different story, especially in the digital age where things change so fast. Lenses do not!
By the way, has anyone checked the latest prices on used M lenses? They have skyrocketed!!! My M lens collection is worth twice as much as I paid as a whole, and in some cases for individual lenses, they have tripled in price!
I really hope the rumors will pan out to a real alternative choice to the M9. Dont get me wrong. The M9 is a great camera, but it is not cheap, and quite frankly, I would be happier spending my money on lenses and less on the camera. One thing is sure: The X100's high ISO looks to be superior to the M9, so if Fuji does make a version with a larger sensor and a lens mount for the M lenses, I would suspect Leica will not be happy. I believe that the pressure from a future M mount digital from Fuji or anyone else wil finally put pressure on Leica to make a digital full frame CL type camera at a significantly lower price than the M9.
Would a digital CL mbe a disaster for Leica? I dont think so! Leica should market their lenses more than the cameras. That is what I consider important in Leica. The glass!!!! Cameras are just a means to use the lens, and Leica makes the best in the world in many cases, and I do not mind paying real money for that. The camera is a different story, especially in the digital age where things change so fast. Lenses do not!
By the way, has anyone checked the latest prices on used M lenses? They have skyrocketed!!! My M lens collection is worth twice as much as I paid as a whole, and in some cases for individual lenses, they have tripled in price!