celluloidprop
Well-known
I don't think anyone can answer those questions, bwcolor - so far it's all Fuji marketing hype.
If it meets the D7000/K5 level of performance (also 16MP in APS-C), I'll be happy. If it exceeds, ecstatic.
If it meets the D7000/K5 level of performance (also 16MP in APS-C), I'll be happy. If it exceeds, ecstatic.
yukio
 
Can someone explain the advantage of hexagonal sensor sites and six color filter array.
I would think that hexagonal sensor sites would help mitigate aliasing.
clicker
Well-known
Hype,gas,over extended,broke,more gas
And the beat goes on!
Btw, that X100 is one pretty camera.
And the beat goes on!
Btw, that X100 is one pretty camera.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
...thank god it's black. 
user237428934
User deletion pending
Hopefully the AF is better than the X100 AF. The AF gives me the biggest disappointment with this camera. Whenever there is some depth in the scene with foreground and background items there is a fair chance that the AF choses the background objects although I want the foreground object. I often use the ground next to the object for focussing and then compose.
Photon42
burn the box
[...]
BTW, the Mirrorless Rumors blog appears to be a simple rehash of the French article, and it reproduces the faulty text passage with an interpretation:
I don't believe this until I see a better, more credible source.
The French reads that they conclude this from the small openings on the camera body, I think. That is why I said in the beginning I'm not to sure they're right. But you never know. It would be of course bad news for those who intend to adapt their 1200mm mirror tele lenses
Cheers
Ivo
gavinlg
Veteran
Hopefully the AF is better than the X100 AF. The AF gives me the biggest disappointment with this camera. Whenever there is some depth in the scene with foreground and background items there is a fair chance that the AF choses the background objects although I want the foreground object. I often use the ground next to the object for focussing and then compose.
The problem you're experiencing is simple parralax error for the focusing point.
Turn on 'AF parralax correction frame' in the menu. When a subject is close, use the bottom right focusing box, when subject is mid-long distance, use the top left focusing box.
If you follow these basic steps, you'll probably never have a misfocussed frame ever again...
user237428934
User deletion pending
The problem you're experiencing is simple parralax error for the focusing point.
Turn on 'AF parralax correction frame' in the menu. When a subject is close, use the bottom right focusing box, when subject is mid-long distance, use the top left focusing box.
If you follow these basic steps, you'll probably never have a misfocussed frame ever again...
Never heard of that but I will give it a try.
noimmunity
scratch my niche
2011: successfully sold my Leica lenses and trimmed my M kit while adding strength in the ultra-wide department (APS sensor-ready!)
2012: ready for the long awaited new offering from Fuji!
2012: ready for the long awaited new offering from Fuji!
Leigh Youdale
Well-known
I can't believe that Fuji have managed to wind this place up to fever pitch twice in the space of twelve months with their offerings!
That has to be some sort of record surely?![]()
I didn't think it was Fuji caused all that fuss at all. I thought it was the RFF'ers did it all by themselves. Twice in the space of 12 months, too!
Its about the balance between body and lens. Many of these camera's look and feel like a Lend with a Body attached to it...
Right, like the Sony NEX. This Fuji looks proportional to me.
The problem you're experiencing is simple parralax error for the focusing point.
Turn on 'AF parralax correction frame' in the menu. When a subject is close, use the bottom right focusing box, when subject is mid-long distance, use the top left focusing box.
If you follow these basic steps, you'll probably never have a misfocussed frame ever again...
Yep, it is funny how many people continue to diss the AF when Fuji fixed this long ago.
I didn't think it was Fuji caused all that fuss at all. I thought it was the RFF'ers did it all by themselves. Twice in the space of 12 months, too!
The fact is that Fuji made two rangefinder like cameras that really appeal to RFF users. So yes, Fuji made all the fuss by making large steps in the right direction camera design wise.
user237428934
User deletion pending
The problem you're experiencing is simple parralax error for the focusing point.
Turn on 'AF parralax correction frame' in the menu. When a subject is close, use the bottom right focusing box, when subject is mid-long distance, use the top left focusing box.
If you follow these basic steps, you'll probably never have a misfocussed frame ever again...
Just switched this thing on in the camera. Don't know if it really improves AF success rate but this is a fine focus distance indicator like in the Hexar AF. You will instantly see if the AF is chasing for the wrong subject. Thanks.
gavinlg
Veteran
Just switched this thing on in the camera. Don't know if it really improves AF success rate but this is a fine focus distance indicator like in the Hexar AF. You will instantly see if the AF is chasing for the wrong subject. Thanks.
Hope it solves your focussing issues!
intheviewfinder
Street
I hope this is a winner
I hope this is a winner
I owned a X100 for about 7 months. Image-wise it was a superb camera but it had a lot of quirks that made it less than satisfying so I sold it. I posted about it previously in another thread. There's even a link to a small portfolio of shots (58 photos).
When I read this announcement I realized despite all the quirks of the X100 I miss it. So I'm hoping they've done enough to correct the niggles for me to spring for the whole ball of wax when it gets released.
--Rich
I hope this is a winner
I owned a X100 for about 7 months. Image-wise it was a superb camera but it had a lot of quirks that made it less than satisfying so I sold it. I posted about it previously in another thread. There's even a link to a small portfolio of shots (58 photos).
When I read this announcement I realized despite all the quirks of the X100 I miss it. So I'm hoping they've done enough to correct the niggles for me to spring for the whole ball of wax when it gets released.
--Rich
viramati
Established
this could be very interesting as on the M9 I use basically 3 lenses the 28, 50 and 90. I have the 28 on one body and the 50 on another and use the X100 for quiet street work. If times keep getting harder and this camera live up to expectations I would even consider selling one M body and get this whole system ans still have a few pounds left over!!
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
Interesting that the other imaging giants have left "retro" to Fuji.
migtex
Don't eXchange Freedom!

enough said...
Leigh Youdale
Well-known
The fact is that Fuji made two rangefinder like cameras that really appeal to RFF users. So yes, Fuji made all the fuss by making large steps in the right direction camera design wise.
Well, SOMEBODY has to be singled out for the blame. Can't be us then!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.