aniMal
Well-known
I dont quite know if it is right to start a thread on another photographers pictures, but i suppose it should just be extra PR and then fine.
I was browsing the net for ideas, and came across a great B&W portofolio that I just want to discuss:
http://www.mattstuart.com
I really, really like the style - and I also wonder how many hours of just walking and looking for these surreal moments that is necessary...
I suppose his pictures are ´street´photography, but it doesnt matter. Crosses more over into the surreal one might say...
I was browsing the net for ideas, and came across a great B&W portofolio that I just want to discuss:
http://www.mattstuart.com
I really, really like the style - and I also wonder how many hours of just walking and looking for these surreal moments that is necessary...
I suppose his pictures are ´street´photography, but it doesnt matter. Crosses more over into the surreal one might say...
funkaoshi
Well-known
elude
Some photographer
Great Pictures indeed. Thank you for sharing the link !
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I like the work but halfway through the portfolio I found myself looking for the 'hook' in each photo. It's an interesting style but for some reason I didn't have the desire to go through the whole lot.
Thanks for the link!
Thanks for the link!
Al Kaplan
Veteran
My supposition is that perhaps many are truely "found photographs" but a lot of them appear to be the result of people being asked to move over a bit or look in a certain direction.
35photo
Well-known
I enjoyed looking though the work. Very interesting stuff, as some raised the question that most of his work seems to be found other are questionable. I guess it just adds a bit of mystery to the work a good thing it keeps people thinking. Does anyone know if the photographer has talked about setting up any of the photos? The commission work I can totally see as being set up, but the personal work who knows.... Its fun and interesting none the less nice to see.
Marko
Marko
aniMal
Well-known
My supposition is that perhaps many are truely "found photographs" but a lot of them appear to be the result of people being asked to move over a bit or look in a certain direction.
Well - that is the eternal question with photography like this... In one way it doesnt matter - as long as the image is what it is, but it does say something about the amount of work that goes into it...
Its the old HCB-discussion, dont know if I want to go there
funkaoshi
Well-known
He's a street photographer. I'm pretty sure he's not setting up any of these scenes. There was an interview with him on 2point8, but the site is down right now.
Prosaic
Well-known
Looks like collage in some cases.
antiquark
Derek Ross
I dunno, it seems like he's relying too much on sight gags and juxtapositions.
Brennotdan
Established
I like the work but halfway through the portfolio I found myself looking for the 'hook' in each photo. It's an interesting style but for some reason I didn't have the desire to go through the whole lot.
Thanks for the link!![]()
I completely agree. It became frustrating when I couldn't find it. The ones that have a "hook" then cease to be a puzzle and it's time to move on. I guess I like images with a bit more staying power, and less of a chuckle and flip the page style. Maybe if it was divided into more specific sets I could enjoy it more.
Don't get me wrong, I think it's excellent photography.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
There's no denying that he's a great photographer it's just that when I look through his photos I feel as if I'm being pre-conditioned by his vision to look for a certain element in the work.
I keep worrying that eventually I will come across a tree growing out of the top of someone's head!
I keep worrying that eventually I will come across a tree growing out of the top of someone's head!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.