Halina 35x - the £7 Leica

tunalegs

Pretended Artist
Local time
1:30 PM
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
2,619
halina2.jpg

I recently picked up this rather crude scale focus 35mm camera. Cleaned the lens and regreased the helical, which was the most nightmarish experience I've ever had working on any camera - despite the apparent simplicity of the camera.

Anyway, the Halina 35x was made by Haking in Hong Kong, starting around 1959. It's a rather blatant rip off an older, also rather crummy camera, the Nescon 35. For good measure Haking ripped off Petri's red dot icon. One wonders why they only copied ideas from the bottom of the barrel (ok, so Petri did make a few rather nice cameras - but still).

The Nescon 35 BTW, was a development of the Aruba 35, which apparently was advertised as a Leica for 4000 yen...

The Halina 35x sold for just short of £8 when new - so it was pretty darned cheap for a 35mm camera. The camera was most famous for being made out of metal, apparently.

Interesting notes: two bladed leaf shutter, speed controlled by spring tension. The center element of the triplet lens is uncoated - I guess Haking were really pinching the pennies hard.

Despite the overall lack of confidence this instilled in me for this mechanism, the results are kind of better than I had expected...

halina35x1.jpg


It's acceptably sharp in the center (acceptable for 5x7 prints anyway - probably not for anything larger) - but the focus falls off noticeably in the edges, even at f11. There is some slight vignetting too. The overall effect is reminiscent of the Lomo LC-A in my opinion - but without the noticeable pincushion distortion.

halina35x2.jpg

Crop. Shot at f5.6 noticeably soft.

halina35x3.jpg


Kind of odd flare in a strip along the side.

halina35x4.jpg


Hey! I'm actually pretty good at guessing distances without a rangefinder it turns out! One thing I do not like about the lens is the way it renders OOF areas. But I can't put my finger on what it is that I don't like about it. It's smooth, but in a strangely blurred way - there's something rather unnatural looking about it.

halina35x5.jpg


halina35x6.jpg


I wasn't expecting much, so it did exceed my expectations. However it's a pretty mediocre lens even for a low price triplet. I guess considering these things cost half of what an Argus C3 cost that is acceptable though. Kind of. :lol:
 
Thanks for the run down on this camera, I'd seen it on the bay from time to time and wondered.
Great refurb work! especially for such a low value camera.

Dave
 
Yes it's definitely a notch lower than the cheapy Japanese point and shoots of the era (some of which are actually incredibly good if you don't mind slow shutter speeds and slow lenses).

It does look cool though, and the construction is fairly robust, though crude. I might run more film through it if I want a real faux-vintage look.
 
Hey, I've got one of those. I never put a thought about running film through it, just wanted it for the looks. An early stamped-metal knock-off before the really crude plastic ones started showing up.

PF
 
The photos are certainly....interesting. May be a bit of a focus issue?

I applaud your initiative to get the old thing working again. Cute little booger.
 
I remember these new, they were sold by a chain store in UK. Boots (the Chemist) and were quite popular, that would be in the late 50's or very early 60's. They were under £10 new. They also sold the Cosmic 35 a bakelite Russian camera which had a very good lens. A Smena 8 I think at around the same price as the Halina. Mine is still working well!!😎
 
I think many were abandoned because the greasing of the helical was pretty diabolical - the one that came into my hands became impossible to focus - it just seized up. And at the price, repairs just were not viable.
Well done getting your to work - a labour of love!

jesse
 
Interesting to be the first to continue adding to this thread after a 14 year gap!
Picked up a job lot of cameras that included a Halina 35 - something I wasn't either looking for or wanting!
But its been a slow dull afternoon and out of curiosity I decided to 'have a look'.
It doesn't work! The shutter blades stick and on a closer look its seems somebody somewhere decided to poke them with a sharp stick!
On that basis they are never going to work!
However the whole lens assembly comes off the body after four screws are removed.
I'm now more interested and a bit curious!
If this is mounted on my m4/3 Lumix GM1 and with the Haking shutter glued open?
........... don't hold your breath.
 
Interesting to be the first to continue adding to this thread after a 14 year gap!
Picked up a job lot of cameras that included a Halina 35 - something I wasn't either looking for or wanting!
But its been a slow dull afternoon and out of curiosity I decided to 'have a look'.
It doesn't work! The shutter blades stick and on a closer look its seems somebody somewhere decided to poke them with a sharp stick!
On that basis they are never going to work!
However the whole lens assembly comes off the body after four screws are removed.
I'm now more interested and a bit curious!
If this is mounted on my m4/3 Lumix GM1 and with the Haking shutter glued open?
........... don't hold your breath.
Is yours the model with the shutter that has to be cocked manually, or the one that cocks when you wind?

If its the latter, could you post some photos of the shutter please? I have one that I took apart... and only then found out that all the photos online were of the other model!
 
Sorry - can't help you. I only wanted a Halina 35x for the lens to modify and mount on a m4/3 camera. After making a mess I bought a second camera that I've just binned after realising it was far worse than the first and it wasn't worth spending time on it. I have rectified the mess on the first one but I've still to convince myself I have it focusing on infinity
Isn't 'photography' fun!!
 
Back
Top Bottom