Canon LTM Heads Up for All Interested ~ Canon Sonnar f1.5/50 on Evilbay!

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
Hello Roland,
This is interesting that your two Nikkor 50/1.4's behave differently, which do you yourself prefer,the results from the earlier Tokyo lens or the later Japan version?
Regards,
William

Hi William,

I have never tested them side by side. I should. The Tokyo seems to have nicer bokeh, the Japan seems to be sharper. So I use one for portraits, one for general purpose, currently. Here is a boring Tokyo bokeh shot:

399961800_cRPoW-L.jpg


I like this. Of course bokeh beauty is in the eye of the beholder ....

Best,

Roland.
 
To tell you the truth, I favor the pre-war uncoated Zeiss 5cm 1.5 over the Canon 50/1.5. I have to take more photos with the Canon before I am persuaded otherwise.

And now that I have one, I can only agree. The results, especially in color, are amazing and warm.

3337286805_00c651b399.jpg


3336361546_1af306d302.jpg
 
Yes, the color appears to be warmer with the old Zeiss lenses, as Jim said above. Images look great when left uncorrected in PS. The lens can preserve many grades of grey in the shade due to its low contrast. While the use of such lenses is known to be great with B&W film, it is equally great for pastel colors with color film such as Fuji Reala or Portra NC.
 
I have the family. My favorite is the 35/1.5, mostly because I rarely use the 50mm or 85mm focal lengths. For rendering of images, I prefer the 50mm- unfortunately, I do not "see" well in 50mm.

Hey Roland, if you decide to sell your 50/1.5, give me a holler!

im with you. today i tried to shoot with the nokton 50 and i couldnt stay at a comfortable distance and get everything in a shot. i can get so much closer with the 35 or better yet a 28.

i dont think i got any good shots today.
 
Canon 50/1.5 at F2, on the Bessa R2.

1491182844_dff69b0853_o.jpg


And this one is Wide-Open, but the subject moved while I was focussing...

2287586452_30992dd768.jpg


IMO: Softer than a really good Zeiss Sonnar, more pleasing OOF than the Nikkor 5cm F1.4.
 
Canon 50/1.5 at F2, on the Bessa R2.

1491182844_dff69b0853_o.jpg


And this one is Wide-Open, but the subject moved while I was focussing...

2287586452_30992dd768.jpg


IMO: Softer than a really good Zeiss Sonnar, more pleasing OOF than the Nikkor 5cm F1.4.

I concur.......

Very nice to see you back here Brian, now I don`t have to defend the Canon f1.5/50 all by myself! :D
-
But, honestly with all kidding aside it`s good to see you back here posting at RFF we all missed you!!! :)

Tom

PS: I`ve got a 45' IIIC loaded up and ready to shoot in the morning that "Hacked" 1938 CZJ f2 Sonnar`s going to go through her paces again tomorrow.......
 
Last edited:
Nice shots Brian. I have rarely shot my Canon 50/1.5 at wide apertures (f/2 is the widest if I recall), but this prompts me to try it.

OffTopic: do you have an email id where I can ping you? I am interested in one of those franken-sonnars, or a Zeiss Sonnar pre or post-war lenses. :)
 
Great shots, Brian! Glad to see you here again, although I've been enjoying your photography over at flickr.
 
Hello Roland,
Lovely bokeh shot.Your Gallery "smugmug" portfolio contains some awesome photo's and I recommend any forum member that has not viewed it to do so .The "San Marino" photo is the best "magical " atmospheric photo that I have ever seen along with "Pigeon Point".Wonderful portfolio Roland.
Kindest Regards,
William

Thanks a lot, William !

Brian, good to see you back.

Tom, you don't have to defend the Canon 1.5 by yourself. It is one of my all time favorites. Just saying there are other lenses with good bokeh ... Here are some of mine (previously already shown 1.5 shots):

51007481_6h9Mo-L.jpg


(notice the window screen showing through the bokeh)

101428127_b5UPG-O.jpg


And in color:

419690999_Miz7p-XL.jpg


Cheers,

Roland.
 
Yes, the color appears to be warmer with the old Zeiss lenses ....While the use of such lenses is known to be great with B&W film, it is equally great for pastel colors with color film such as Fuji Reala or Portra NC.

Right you are, Raid. And using just Fuji Superia 200 for less than $2 a 36 roll, I am getting amazing 'chrome-like results. Is this the end of B&W for me? I dunno. :confused:
 
Brian,

I will check out these pm links! Maybe we can reach you.

There are many skilled and talented people at RFF, and you certainly have proven yourself over and over as someone with great talents and personal qualities.
 
Tom, you don't have to defend the Canon 1.5 by yourself. It is one of my all time favorites. Just saying there are other lenses with good bokeh ....

Heheheheheh Ohh I know I`m just kidding around :)

I need to SHOOT more with mine, INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT IT!!!!! lol!!! :D

*I had a Canon f1.2 ~ "Tokyo" Nikkor f1.4 ~ a "Hacked" CZJ f2 Sonnar and a"Wartime" F3.5/50 Elmar day on Monday!!!!* (The Canon f1.2 on my M6 and the rest of the lenses on one of my 1945 "non stamp" IIIC K`s)

I was feeling daring and I NEVER shot the f1.2 before and haven`t touched an Elmar in years!!!! I also had a delightful model, fly in from NYC yesterday and we shot some crazy retro pinup and fetish work, so I will post the more artistic work someplace here at RFF at the end of this week when it`s all developed and scanned.....

Tom
 
I suspect the seller's reputation had something to do with that. But that's over 7 times what I paid for mine 4 years ago. Mine did need an internal cleaning. Oh, it also had a filter ring ding, removed by DAG.
 
Back
Top Bottom