click
Established
I have an exciting project that I've been approached to do. I have twelve years in photography but I rarely do it for money so I don't know what to charge.
I will be making a still movie for a magician to play in a loop in the window of his theater. I have made Flash movies before and they take an amazing amount of time to complete. He also wants to be able to use the images for print and the web. Essentially I'd be creating a brand for him.
So I'm guesstimating that I'll spend about 160 hours photographing, developing, scanning, photochoppin' printing and making the Flash movie that will be complete with music and text. This does not include the time I will spend researching and conceptualizing the ideas for the shots. All this is easily a months worth of work, and because I'm a bit of a perfectionist I'll probably spend more than that on it.
While I'm an amateur I do have excellent credentials. First of all I didn't just pick up a camera yesterday and start shooting. I've taken art classes for thirty years and am a graduate of a French art school. I have Leica equipment and know how to use it and the stuff isn't cheap. I also have extensive knowledge of Flash which is a specialized computer field that is very expensive. I'll do a first class job with all of it no matter how much or little I get paid.
I called a friend in a large metropolitan area and asked what they would charge. I was told about $15,000 for such a project. Here's the problem: I live in a very economically depressed area (Arkansas, and don't ask) and while the magician is well established I'm certain that there isn't that amount of money for the project. I want to do it but I'm not sure what would be reasonable. If I charged $20 per hour which seems more than reasonable for advanced services in this area it comes out to $3200 for the project. What do you guys think? I know I'm worth a whole lot more than this and in reality in another market I'd want $9000 for my time, expertise and most of all my artistic ability.
Thank you for your responses.
I will be making a still movie for a magician to play in a loop in the window of his theater. I have made Flash movies before and they take an amazing amount of time to complete. He also wants to be able to use the images for print and the web. Essentially I'd be creating a brand for him.
So I'm guesstimating that I'll spend about 160 hours photographing, developing, scanning, photochoppin' printing and making the Flash movie that will be complete with music and text. This does not include the time I will spend researching and conceptualizing the ideas for the shots. All this is easily a months worth of work, and because I'm a bit of a perfectionist I'll probably spend more than that on it.
While I'm an amateur I do have excellent credentials. First of all I didn't just pick up a camera yesterday and start shooting. I've taken art classes for thirty years and am a graduate of a French art school. I have Leica equipment and know how to use it and the stuff isn't cheap. I also have extensive knowledge of Flash which is a specialized computer field that is very expensive. I'll do a first class job with all of it no matter how much or little I get paid.
I called a friend in a large metropolitan area and asked what they would charge. I was told about $15,000 for such a project. Here's the problem: I live in a very economically depressed area (Arkansas, and don't ask) and while the magician is well established I'm certain that there isn't that amount of money for the project. I want to do it but I'm not sure what would be reasonable. If I charged $20 per hour which seems more than reasonable for advanced services in this area it comes out to $3200 for the project. What do you guys think? I know I'm worth a whole lot more than this and in reality in another market I'd want $9000 for my time, expertise and most of all my artistic ability.
Thank you for your responses.