Richard G
Veteran
Judging high ISO between cameras is difficult unless you shoot them in the same light/identical scene. I could probably make the M9 look cleaner at ISO 1600 than the D3, if I shot the M9 outside and the D3 in a closet.
Ain't it the truth. Here is my daughter at ISO 1600:

luuca
Well-known
2500 iso, m9, LR4
crop 100%
not a D4, but good enough for me and for my prints.

crop 100%

not a D4, but good enough for me and for my prints.
Richard G
Veteran
Very good control of that ISO Luuca. Nice shot too.
luuca
Well-known
Very good control of that ISO Luuca. Nice shot too.
thanks, the m9 cdd is not as malleable as modern c-mos, but if you expose properly (not to the right nor to the left...) and pay attention to the WB, you can get usable shots even at 2500
having said that, I rarely need to push the camera over 800.
stitchohana
Well-known
since you have gotten the M9, time to enjoy it. look ahead. most of the time u won't shoot more than iso 800, unless it's a super low light location
I sold my D700 to fund for my purchase of the M9P, no regrets. so far im enjoying my photos from the M9P.

Fishing Cat by stitchohana, on Flickr
I sold my D700 to fund for my purchase of the M9P, no regrets. so far im enjoying my photos from the M9P.

Fishing Cat by stitchohana, on Flickr
luuca
Well-known
a more critical situation:
1/12 iso 2500 f2 M9, lr4
crop1 of focused zone (well... a little blurred...)
crop of OOF zone
hope it could help
1/12 iso 2500 f2 M9, lr4

crop1 of focused zone (well... a little blurred...)

crop of OOF zone

hope it could help
Hosermage
Well-known
Here are a few 2500 by the campfire...


umcelinho
Marcelo
I notice many of the shots with banding or that are too noisy look like they had exposure brought up a stop or even more, which significantly make noise worse.
I've taken a few using 1600 and 2500 exposing properly and it's quite good actually, at least to my taste. also, usually when I bump exposure up I keep 1 stop as max but then adjust blacks, contrast and white balance so that the outcome is more pleasing to the eye.
1250:

M9 @ iso1250 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
2500:

M9 @ iso2500 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
great IQ at 640...

testing 1 2 3 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
I've taken a few using 1600 and 2500 exposing properly and it's quite good actually, at least to my taste. also, usually when I bump exposure up I keep 1 stop as max but then adjust blacks, contrast and white balance so that the outcome is more pleasing to the eye.
1250:

M9 @ iso1250 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
2500:

M9 @ iso2500 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
great IQ at 640...

testing 1 2 3 by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
wintoid
Back to film
I don't worry about shooting at ISO2500 on my M9. Most of my stuff is BW though. With my M8, the noise *level* didn't bother me at high ISO, but the *pattern* did.

Saturday post-dancing boredom by wintoid, on Flickr

Saturday post-dancing boredom by wintoid, on Flickr
Richard G
Veteran
Wow you guys are getting good results. Agree about needing the exposure and not raising it in LR too much. My Monochrom GAS is almost gone.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.