Captain
Well-known
The rangefinder forum has wonderful diversity. There is a section for Leica M, Voigtlanders, Canon and Nikon, even a spot for Zorkis, but where does the humble Minolta CLE fit in? Is it just an "Other"?
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
I figure it under Leica M since it is a kissing cousin. 
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
Do the normal LTM lenses all work on the CLE?
EDIT: i mean M-mount not LTM, of course :bang:
EDIT: i mean M-mount not LTM, of course :bang:
back alley
IMAGES
m leica is where i would post.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Pherdinand said:Do the normal LTM lenses all work on the CLE?
EDIT: i mean M-mount not LTM, of course :bang:
I believe there are some limitations (IIRC, because of the light meter), but yes, it is an M mount camera. It has f-lines for 28, 40, and 90. (edit: btw, a GREAT camera, and a heck of a shooter—one of my favorites)
Last edited:
laptoprob
back to basics
The CLE is a Leica M in disguise. Everything Leica ever dreamed about but were afraid (or unable) to build. Minolta took a huge step forwards in this electronically managed little gem.
I knwe the metering and exposure system from the SLR X700 for many years before I got to the RF world. I am still thrilled. Even a 50mm f1,2 will focus perfectly. I did calibrate the rangefinder specifically for this. AE exposure has its specific use and within those boundaries it works great.
The CLE is not perfect but it comes close. It is definetly worthy of having the M mount.
As for Pherdinands lenses question, most LTM and M lenses work on the CLE. Only very deep intruding ones give problems. The Summicron DR is not possible. Cameraquest has a section about this compatibility if I'm not mistaken.
I knwe the metering and exposure system from the SLR X700 for many years before I got to the RF world. I am still thrilled. Even a 50mm f1,2 will focus perfectly. I did calibrate the rangefinder specifically for this. AE exposure has its specific use and within those boundaries it works great.
The CLE is not perfect but it comes close. It is definetly worthy of having the M mount.
As for Pherdinands lenses question, most LTM and M lenses work on the CLE. Only very deep intruding ones give problems. The Summicron DR is not possible. Cameraquest has a section about this compatibility if I'm not mistaken.
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
Hmmm...Thanks.
Is a CLE with a 40/2 Rokkor in excellent condition a good deal for euro 500+?
[Just thinking...and drooling...]
Is a CLE with a 40/2 Rokkor in excellent condition a good deal for euro 500+?
[Just thinking...and drooling...]
laptoprob
back to basics
Yeah Pherdinand, it is a good deal if perfect. I got the set for 400 euros. That's why Todd Hanz of the forum here got a good deal from me on the Rokkor.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Pherdinand said:Hmmm...Thanks.
Is a CLE with a 40/2 Rokkor in excellent condition a good deal for euro 500+?
[Just thinking...and drooling...]
I thnk I saw on an online Leica price guide that the M-Rokkor was "valued" at around $250-$300. It's a nice lens.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.