crawdiddy
qu'est-ce que c'est?
I use them most of the time, but I'm not catholic about it.
I'm Jewish. No hoods for me.
I use them most of the time, but I'm not catholic about it.
Hood - always. And I make sure it's efficient (preferably rectangular), so I never use those round vented hoods, as they're a waste of time.
NB: efficient does not equal bulky - my favourite hood is the rectangular yet compact 35mm Summicron hood.
Always a hood and never a filter, why would i need an uv filter; except for protecting the front lens element? I have read somewhere that some leitz engineer has stated that the lenses made since the 70's or 80's don't need uv-filters as they've already done this within the coating of the lens. Thoughts on this?
A good lens hood is an integral part of the lens design - otherwise why would manufacturers like Leica design, build and even patent lens hood designs and fitting systems.
As flare resistant as modern lenses are these days, I always use a hood. I have a matching hood for (nearly) every one of my lenses; M mount, Mamiya, Canon FD/EF... It might be a sickness, I haven't decided yet.
Not only do they combat flare, they offer a measure of physical protection.
I really like rubber collapsible lens hoods, but in many cases they're just too generic. They also don't work well with zooms.