p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
A Helios 58 f2 that came with the Zenit 12XP
A Super Takumar 50 f/1.4 to use it on the Zenit
An EF 50 f/1.8 II to use on the Canon EOS 5
An Elmar 50 f/3.5 for my Leica IIc
and a Practikar 50 f/1.8 for my Praktica BC-1
A Super Takumar 50 f/1.4 to use it on the Zenit
An EF 50 f/1.8 II to use on the Canon EOS 5
An Elmar 50 f/3.5 for my Leica IIc
and a Practikar 50 f/1.8 for my Praktica BC-1
Tompas
Wannabe Künstler
3 -- a 1.8/50 Nikkor for my Nikons, a 1.4/50 Pentax-A for my Pentaxen, a 2/50 M-Hexanon for my Bessas. All very good.
adamli629
Member
For RF, I have four...
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I answered 1 because at the moment I only have 1 50mm RF lens. In the past I have had a few more than that but now it is only one. Well, there are a couple of parts of 2 J8's still around that have been used for spares 
Please don't ask about the SLRs though. Most hast a standard lens fitted so it is certainly a lot more than 5!!
Kim
Please don't ask about the SLRs though. Most hast a standard lens fitted so it is certainly a lot more than 5!!
Kim
retnull
Well-known
Used to have 4, but now down to 2: tabbed Summicron and a very clean Summar.
cnphoto
Well-known
I have 3, but may add a 4th
i have a Summitar, uncoated Elmar and Industar-22. I wouldn't mind something a little faster, but it isn't necessary really.
bhop73
Well-known
5 or more for me. When I got my Leica, I got the Jupiter 8 first, then a Canon 50 f/1.4 to replace it, but kept the Jupiter. I have a Nikon 50 1.8 AF-D that I bought on its own, but got a 50 1.4 ais that came with my FE. Then the 50 1.7 that came with my Pentax K1000, and two other Pentax 50 f/2s that came with a couple other Pentax cameras I have.. I think that's it..
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
New update...
Gone abit Silly Mad
though I must admit screwmount leica can be ridicously CHEAP ...more so when You have Dear Friends willing to part with their Jewels
At Present:
1937 Summar
1951 Elamr 50 3.5
1989 Summilux
1970 Summicron
and i promise YOU I'm Done
unless i can get the 'Tokyo Nikkor' that I have been RESISTING
50's are SUPREME for Me !!!!
Gone abit Silly Mad
though I must admit screwmount leica can be ridicously CHEAP ...more so when You have Dear Friends willing to part with their Jewels
At Present:
1937 Summar
1951 Elamr 50 3.5
1989 Summilux
1970 Summicron
and i promise YOU I'm Done
unless i can get the 'Tokyo Nikkor' that I have been RESISTING
50's are SUPREME for Me !!!!
maddoc
... likes film again.
From memory ...
Summarit
Elmar red-scale
Summitar (front element separation)
Noctilux
Zeiss Sonnar S-mount
Nikkor-S-C
Nikkor Ais
... it might be actually more but I lost overview and pretty much don`t care.
Summarit
Elmar red-scale
Summitar (front element separation)
Noctilux
Zeiss Sonnar S-mount
Nikkor-S-C
Nikkor Ais
... it might be actually more but I lost overview and pretty much don`t care.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
Umm! I felt guilty so I checked my list for the SLRs. If you count the 55mm "std" lenses as well, it comes to 87.
But I only have one for the RF's! 
Kim
Kim
You need a database for your gear ??![]()
damien.murphy
Damien
Voted before, but that was before I had 3 50mm lenses. This was by no means my intention, and as soon the third one arrives in the next few days, I shall be slimming back to one.
Funny how lenses build up, first 50 was a previous version summicron, which after being accompanied by a 1st version elmar which came as a package with an M4, was sold packaged with an M6. In the search for something faster, a Zeiss Sonnar-C joined the party, with the third to be a 50mm Voigtlander f1.1.
The elmar and sonnar will go shortly, as the f1.1 becomes my main 50 should I gel with it, but already a summar, summarit or other character 50 is on my mind, so I'm not sure I will ever just have one 50
I should add that I'm a 50mm shooter in the main, and this is the only focal length in which I have multiple lenses.
Funny how lenses build up, first 50 was a previous version summicron, which after being accompanied by a 1st version elmar which came as a package with an M4, was sold packaged with an M6. In the search for something faster, a Zeiss Sonnar-C joined the party, with the third to be a 50mm Voigtlander f1.1.
The elmar and sonnar will go shortly, as the f1.1 becomes my main 50 should I gel with it, but already a summar, summarit or other character 50 is on my mind, so I'm not sure I will ever just have one 50
I should add that I'm a 50mm shooter in the main, and this is the only focal length in which I have multiple lenses.
Last edited:
deirdre
Well-known
Umm! I felt guilty so I checked my list for the SLRs. If you count the 55mm "std" lenses as well, it comes to 87.But I only have one for the RF's!
Kim
Then again, I'm new here. When I joined a fountain pen forum, I couldn't imagine having 87 pens, and now I've got more than a hundred (and haven't been able to get below a hundred in more than two years).
Kim Coxon
Moderator
Probably time for a clear out. 
Kim
Kim
87? I can't imagine having 87 lenses, let alone 87 in 50-55mm.
deirdre
Well-known
Probably time for a clear out.![]()
I could easily afford a new M9 if I did. Believe me, it's been tempting.
retro
Well-known
I don't know how many 50mm lenses I own. 
timor
Well-known
Way too many, and I hardly use them, but they came with every single body I bought.
dyao
Well-known
William Albert Allard had at least three: a 2.0, a 1.4, and a 1.0
faris
Well-known
I have 9.
6 RF.
3 DSLR.
I have limited vision.
6 RF.
3 DSLR.
I have limited vision.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.