giganova
Well-known
I submitted PDF of select photos, a synopsis and cover letter to a few book publishers. Some expressed interest, but they asked me what my budget was! Are they expecting that I chip in some of the publication costs?
Possibly. But if they are bona fides publishers (in the old sense of bona fides), they may be angling for an indication of how much of an advance they may have to offer. They won't want to offer you an advance that is too small to cover the probable costs of your finishing the book, while keeping it low enough that they can afford to pay it.I submitted PDF of select photos, a synopsis and cover letter to a few book publishers. Some expressed interest, but they asked me what my budget was! Are they expecting that I chip in some of the publication costs?
Good! See you at Arles next year? From the sound of it, this is the kind of thing they were angling for.Thanks, Roger, for making me understand this better! The ones that have expressed interest are solid bona fides (ha!) publishers with a track record of great photography books. They also asked whether I have institutional support and whether I plan on exhibits.
I just downloaded the Writers' and Artists' Yearbook Kindle book ... reading it now!
Insh'Allah!I'd love to go to Arles next year ... hopefully I can make it happen!
The probability that they are trying to figure the size of an advance, these days, is virtually nil. Short of winning a prize in a photo book completion, such as the annual Kassel dummy book completion, where the prize is getting your book published, an unpublished, unknown photographer is not likely to get his or her photo book published without paying all or a portion of the printing costs, even if it's a major publisher. That's the negative aspect of recent developments in photo book publishing....they may be angling for an indication of how much of an advance they may have to offer...If they are expecting you to contribute to the printing and publication costs, on the other hand, then they are what used to be called "vanity publishers"...
Are you sure? Have you direct experience? I haven't: I've written only non-fiction books about photography, i.e. heavily illustrated texts. With advances.Big Ursus - the original post is about publishing a photo book, which involves a completely different situation from publishing a fiction or non-fiction book that one has written. As stated in my previous posting, these days it's highly unlikely and unusual that a photo book, a photographer's monograph if you will, can be published without the photographer funding it partially or wholly, if the photographer is not well known.
Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine
Thanks. Please forgive my quizzing you as I have, but all too often, the people on photo (and other) forums are running at best on second-hand information, and sometimes on pure fantasy. Hence my skepticism. And, now, hence my apologies.Roger - Yes, and based on discussions with a major French publisher — as well discussions and correspondence with David Alan Harvey. He mentors photographers on publishing photo books, and has written along these lines in comments on his BURN Magazine website and, as far as I recall, on Instagram.
As I understand it, his general view is that the traditional way of publishing photo books was waned but that self-publishing has blossomed and transformed the whole field: to the point that there is a "renaissance" of photo book publishing and that photographers can have much more freedom in what and how they publish — although with all this comes the necessity of developing an audience by the photographer by himself or herself.
As stated earlier, the ability to break even in an offset print run of a mere 500 books is what has brought this flexibility. Someone else who has written extensively about the current situation on photo book publishing is Jörg Colberg on his Conscientious Photo Magazine blog.
_______________
Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine
Big Ursus - the original post is about publishing a photo book, which involves a completely different situation from publishing a fiction or non-fiction book that one has written. As stated in my previous posting, these days it's highly unlikely and unusual that a photo book, a photographer's monograph if you will, can be published without the photographer funding it partially or wholly, if the photographer is not well known.
... although with all this comes the necessity of developing an audience by the photographer by himself or herself.
.... Without a gallery, or museum show, how does the photographer develop a following.
Probably online exposure, like an online portfolio, Facebook, Instagram, etc. ? Does anyone had developed a following using those channels?
Clearly instagram has a huge following, but does a following on it mean much, as far as money or mainstream fame?
Not sure why 3,000 copies should represent a "basic first printing." These days not only are the bulk of photo books, even distinguished ones, self-published, but, also, photographers often start with editions as small as 500 or 1,000 copies. The aim of the photographer is often to try to get that small edition out to influential photographers, galleries and editors. Not easy to do. Also, not easy to develop a following, unless your dummy book wins a prize....Do any of these books even reach the basic first printing, 3000 copy distribution? Without a gallery, or museum show, how does the photographer develop a following.