back alley
IMAGES
damn!
i just looked at the massive dev chart only to discover there is no hp5 @1600 for diafine development.
i shot a roll of hp5 and tri-x, both at 1600, as a test for this diafine, (& the 28)
hhmmm...anyone ever tried hp5 @1600 in diafine?
joe
i just looked at the massive dev chart only to discover there is no hp5 @1600 for diafine development.
i shot a roll of hp5 and tri-x, both at 1600, as a test for this diafine, (& the 28)
hhmmm...anyone ever tried hp5 @1600 in diafine?
joe
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
the EI for HP5 in Diafine is 800, and TriX is 1250 (?), IIRC.
back alley
IMAGES
mdc has tri-x at 1600
hp5 at 800
hp5 at 800
W
wlewisiii
Guest
I've run HP5@800. But that's only one stop, I doubt that anyone would be able to tell the difference between my negs and yours once dunked in Diafine.
The real difference seems to be for the films that can get pushed 2 or more stops (Tri-X forex).
William
The real difference seems to be for the films that can get pushed 2 or more stops (Tri-X forex).
William
back alley
IMAGES
i'm probably gonna try it.
joe
joe
T_om
Well-known
backalley photo said:damn!
i just looked at the massive dev chart only to discover there is no hp5 @1600 for diafine development.
i shot a roll of hp5 and tri-x, both at 1600, as a test for this diafine, (& the 28)
hhmmm...anyone ever tried hp5 @1600 in diafine?
joe
HP5+ is one of my favorites in Diafine. I rate it at 800, but your film shot at 1600 should still produce very usable negatives.
As for Tri-X, MANY people shoot Tri-X at 1600 when using Diafine, but I prefer about 1250. That extra little boost in the shadows appeals to me. Try both and see which you prefer. What I normally do is set my meter for 1250 and adjust on the fly for different lighting conditions. The flatter the light, the more exposure I give the film.
Tom
back alley
IMAGES
been scanning...
don't like hp5 at 1600
love tri-x at 1600
pics to follow soon.
joe
don't like hp5 at 1600
love tri-x at 1600
pics to follow soon.
joe
wclavey
Established
hp5 is the one film I would not choose again for developing in Diafine - - I was not pleased with the results and there are so many other ASA 400 films that I do like in Diafine. My son & I just finished a batch of 20 rolls (35mm) and decided that it does not enlarge as well as we would like - - the contact prints look great but they just don't hold up on enlarging. Tmax 400, Arista EDU 400, and Tri-X all fit our needs much better.
Share: