splaaash
Established
I bought an ND filter pro "ND 2.7" 400X
What is it???
I supposed 2.7 are the stops down??? But 400 X ---will self destruct at the 401st. image
Why not 2 stops or 3 stops why 2.7???? If that's what it means
HELP
I supposed 2.7 are the stops down??? But 400 X ---will self destruct at the 401st. image
Why not 2 stops or 3 stops why 2.7???? If that's what it means
HELP
ferider
Veteran
9 stops, 2.7 optical density.
mfogiel
Veteran
Yes, 9 stops, great filter for these lonely piers in the mist, if you want to join the queue generated by Michael Kenna. Don't forget about the reciprocity failure.
splaaash
Established
9 STOPS
I paid 5€---no wonder they sold it
It looks really good has a green tint....looks really cool...IF anyone looked
Indeed in sunlight its f3.5 @20th second
NINE STOPS gosh well it might be useful---
I paid 5€---no wonder they sold it
It looks really good has a green tint....looks really cool...IF anyone looked
NINE STOPS gosh well it might be useful---
Luddite Frank
Well-known
For those bright sunny days, when all you have is Ilford ISO 3200... 
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
more for those sunny days where need to expose for some seconds. there are not so many situations where you need to do that, but when you need, you need.
BillBingham2
Registered User
52mm?
Nikon sold them for photographing a solar eclipse. I have one, even used it once some years back.
B2
Nikon sold them for photographing a solar eclipse. I have one, even used it once some years back.
B2
Dan Daniel
Well-known
For your info, a little discussion of the '2.7' numer. It represents 9 stops in the DIN system, where each stop is 0.3-
http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/decoding-neutral-density.html
And then this company has a 400x filter, 2.6 not 2.7-
http://www.genustech.tv/collections/nd-filters
http://www.genustech.tv/products/nd400-neutral-density-filter-77mm
http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/decoding-neutral-density.html
And then this company has a 400x filter, 2.6 not 2.7-
http://www.genustech.tv/collections/nd-filters
http://www.genustech.tv/products/nd400-neutral-density-filter-77mm
YYV_146
Well-known
9 STOPS
I paid 5€---no wonder they sold it
It looks really good has a green tint....looks really cool...IF anyone lookedIndeed in sunlight its f3.5 @20th second
NINE STOPS gosh well it might be useful---
2-3 second exposures are possible in daylight. IMO this is the sweet spot for blurring moving water...
Dwig
Well-known
52mm?
Nikon sold them for photographing a solar eclipse. I have one, even used it once some years back.
B2
The only high density Nikon ND that was offered was an ND4.00 (13-1/3 stops), at least during the 1974-1995 period during which I ran camera stores. This matched the highest density that Kodak offered in their line of ND gels.
splaaash
Established
I want to try to make people vanish on a busy-ish square
Bill Clark
Veteran
May I suggest an alternative? I'll stick my oar into the water.
My recommendation is to look and learn at how the function of a ND filter can now be performed during the process stage with a computer. There are several ways to achieve results that, to me at least, with a computer and a program such as Photoshop can offer many iterations.
Check out this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3QYTsHX-v4
Copy this into Google search:
nd filter effect with a computer
My recommendation is to look and learn at how the function of a ND filter can now be performed during the process stage with a computer. There are several ways to achieve results that, to me at least, with a computer and a program such as Photoshop can offer many iterations.
Check out this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3QYTsHX-v4
Copy this into Google search:
nd filter effect with a computer
splaaash
Established
Photoshop
costs 120€/$ then i saw when i last looked a year or two ago adobe insist on paid updates each month i think----
VERY expensive,i imagine many can justify the price and it seems to do everything But gimp and raw therepee are free
Though after printing and reading the instructions and watching youtube i cant really use it so i gave up RAW files a few weeks ago
Even paint or other programs are just tooo complicated,
VERY expensive,i imagine many can justify the price and it seems to do everything But gimp and raw therepee are free
Though after printing and reading the instructions and watching youtube i cant really use it so i gave up RAW files a few weeks ago
Even paint or other programs are just tooo complicated,
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.