Sparrow
Veteran
sorry couldn't help it, F3 and the 105/2.5
I Can't Believe it it's not Bokeh
- Thread starter Sparrow
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 22
- Views 2K
sorry couldn't help it, F3 and the 105/2.5
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Nice photograph and unusual focus on the far eye Stewart ... was that deliberate?
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
The DOF is too shallow for this kind of portrait. Really draws attention to itself rather than the subject.
Sparrow
Veteran
Gosh no ... snap and wish
Last edited:
Sparrow
Veteran
the others were much worse
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I don't necessarily agree with that ... but I think it would have worked better with the focus on the near eye!
Sparrow
Veteran
Naa .. the composition would be wrong, too close to the LH side
Sparrow
Veteran
PS ones eye would have gone of to the top left,, and out of the frame
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Personally, I like the DOF and far-eye focus. I think it's a terrific portrait.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Maybe a stop down would have brought her nose and mouth a little more into focus ... but you probably don't like that idea either! 😛
Sparrow
Veteran
thanks, I was just blowing off the end of the film. In a dark hotel-room overlooking lake Windermere, my daughter ... she took the better picks that day
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2453/4083007605_f0e55707a0_b.jpg
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I saw that on your flickr today, Sparrow, what's she shooting with?
Sparrow
Veteran
I'm a RF type of guy, so f2.5 sounds OK, f3 2.5/105 comes as a bit of a surprise
Sparrow
Veteran
Minolta x-700, that looks like the 28, she has the f2/50 and the f2.8/135 ... and my film probably 🙄
She took these: photos from Alice's second film
the focus is a bit if'y on that last one :🙂 shabby
Last edited:
Richard G
Veteran
I like your portrait...the left hand fingernail in focus is an interesting touch as well. I see what the others mean too. You're very gracious about the feedback. My daughter, 16, has also taken to film, which she also doesn't pay for. I bought her a Nikon F3HP, Italian designed body but its blokiness otherwise seems to suit her. She uses PCs in preference to Macs and despite her bluntness hasn't said that an RF is a girl's camera but she probably thinks so.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Stewart,
The focus was God is punishing you for not using an RF.
Seriously, nice portrait -- and I think the focus works. The far eye is far more dramatic than the near eye would have been, though ideally I'd have used 8x10 and the 21 inch Ross, with a tiny bit of swing back to hold both eyes.
Although it's probably terribly politically incorrect to say, "You have a very attractive daighter, and photographed her well," you have, and you did.
Cheers,
R.
The focus was God is punishing you for not using an RF.
Seriously, nice portrait -- and I think the focus works. The far eye is far more dramatic than the near eye would have been, though ideally I'd have used 8x10 and the 21 inch Ross, with a tiny bit of swing back to hold both eyes.
Although it's probably terribly politically incorrect to say, "You have a very attractive daighter, and photographed her well," you have, and you did.
Cheers,
R.
Sparrow
Veteran
too much wine not enough dinner sorry, I abandoned LF in my teens ... thankfully.
She dances too, and correctness is not an issue, beauty is what beauty is.
Regards
Shac
Well-known
Portrait works for me Stewart - nice to see the "rule" broken
crawdiddy
qu'est-ce que c'est?
Beautiful portrait. Rules were made to be broken. And you can get away with breaking them, if you're skillful, as Stewart is.
raid
Dad Photographer
Yes, I agree that rules are there to be [occasionally and selectively] be broken.This is a beautiufl photo, Stewart.
Similar threads
- former member
- W/NW Words no Words.
