I want to be impressed but i'm not and it looks like I'm in a very small minority here.
Some lenses really 'jump off the screen' for me. Summar 50, Collapsible 50, Summaron 2.8, SA 3.4 for example.
Is it the Zeiss 'look' that I just don't connect with?
Of course I appreciate its qualities. I didn't say it's a 'bad' lens as such and it's not down to individual images.
It's more about rendition.
I believe I'm correct in saying the the Sonnar look has a slightly soft rendering and although I'm not at all obsessed with sharpness maybe that's where my problem lies....
"I believe i'm correct in saying the the Sonnar look has a slightly soft rendering and although i'm not at all obsessed with sharpness maybe that's where my problem lies...."
It depends on the f stop. At f 5.6 you get a nice balance between razor sharp and creamy, by f 8.0 it is only razor sharp:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.