gareth
Established
I've never seen another camera system that inspires so much primal emotion among people.
If there is one thing that might put me off owning a Leica, it's the snobbery and bull **** that is associated with them.
The M8 will NEVER been as reliable as the previous M cameras..
The reason Leica Ms have been reliable in the field is because the entire camera is mechanical. If you over-engineer a mechanical device, it'll undoubtly be reliable.
The M8 is an electronic device, housed in a non-weather sealed body - it is a tough body however. Regardless the body material, since it's not weather sealed, dust and moisture can get inside the camera and those elements are deadly to electronics... The M8 will NEVER been as reliable as the previous M cameras..
I understand Leica's are reliable, but I also understand they are probably not as reliable or as sturdy as most Japanese pro spec cameras. And god help you if you have any serious problems, they ain't cheap to fix.
However the good news for the new M8 is that it has fewer moving parts. As a time served instrument tech I know that well thought out and manufactured electronics are generally always more reliable than their mechanical equivalents.
If Leica have dome their homework, the M8 will probably be the most reliable camera they have ever made.
I figure this is make or break time for Leica. Increased western wealth, the internet and Mr Cosina have re-invigorated interest in these traditional cameras. There is a consumer market for them, and Leica won't be slow to capitalise on the bull **** and mythology. I also suspect that there are a fair number of photojournalists and other pro shooters forced over from their old film M6's and M7's to digital SLR's who are just itching to dust down their Leica lenses once more.
In short there is a market out there. If it's a good camera I think it will sell. I sure hope so.