Ilford HP5+ and Delta 400

Marsopa

Well-known
Local time
1:11 AM
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
287
Hi:

I've been using HP5+ (just one 100' bulk roll) and now it's time to buy a new one... just wondering what do you think about delta 400 as I don't find it referenced so many times as HP5+...

Thanls and bests.

P.S. I hope my redaction skills doesn't make the message too criptic.
 
Delta 400 - the only film I use for MF. I don't know why, probably it's easier to get in my location. and I love it in Ultrafine particularly
 
HP5+ is a traditional-base film, where Delta 400 is "modern" Delta-grain (like Kodak T-grain Tmax's) film.

T-grain films are more linear in terms of tone reproduction, so usually traditional films give more freedom with exposure and also development. In oppose T-grain films give better contrast to extreme shadows and highlights, where traditional films often give nicer contrast to midtones.

Usually it is just a matter of taste anyway, especially if you scan your negatives.
 
Thanks, I was wondering if HP5+ is more flexible with respect overexposure and easier to avoid loss on highlights...
 
HP5+ has worked well in any developer I have tossed it in. It worked really well for a scene I had to underexpose 2 stops and overdevelop. It has also wroked really well for another scene whre I had to overexpose and underdevelop. I think that means it pushes & pulls nicely.

I haven't used Delta 400.
 
Maybe just get a single roll or two to see how you like it before committing to a hundred footer.


Wise advice, I've used twice delta 100, I'll do the same with 400...

P.S. Nice avatar pic...

Yes.

Cheers,

R.

Thanks, in spanish we say "lo breve si bueno dos veces bueno", in english it would more or less "What's good, when brief, is twice as good"... that makes your reply twice as good. Thanks
 
Back
Top Bottom