Ilford Pan F 50 - what to expect

[dadsm3]

Thanks for advice Allan, yes you're right about the trees, I guess I lost them (and the inside of the road rail) when I increased the contrast in PS cuz I liked the clouds....I'll have to check.

 

[ChrisN]

I shoot alot of Acros rated at ISO 50 and 100 using a slower film like Pan F hasn't been much of a problem for me in my RF's.

Here are a couple of Pan F in D76 1:1 for 8.5 min @ 68* F. These are 35mm, in camera metering (M6, VC 35/1.2 Nokton)

Oohh - you've got a Ducati in the back there, too. Is that a 750 Sport? I had one of those once - another one I should never have sold!

 

[Trius]

Mike: I don't think Rodinal 1:25 is a good choice for Pan F+. 1:50 or even 1:100 seems a better choice. I realize you upped the contrast in PS for one of them, but IMO you're losing the tonality you could get with lower dilution ... and don't over-agitate.

Earl