ferider
Veteran
That 40/2 is a cool lens, Ray ...
Thanks for posting the photos, guys. My film will take a while (as usual).
And Mike, true, that III and Nikon were quite something. Didn't help:
my 35/1.8 GAS is worse than ever !
Cheers,
Roland.
Thanks for posting the photos, guys. My film will take a while (as usual).
And Mike, true, that III and Nikon were quite something. Didn't help:
my 35/1.8 GAS is worse than ever !
Cheers,
Roland.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Many highlights Thursday night. I liked Mike's Leica III, Randy's M4, and Roland's "Elvis" camera. I stayed away from the S3 and the M8 as much as possible! Roland's demonstration of the "quick load" was interesting. 
Randy, the first thing I did when I got home was check my Rokkor.
It's straight and not curved.
Mike I haven't checked the strap yet to see if it fits the Rollei.
Ted, I'll check in with you when you're back in town, and we'll grab some lunch., ok?
Until next time!

Randy, the first thing I did when I got home was check my Rokkor.
Mike I haven't checked the strap yet to see if it fits the Rollei.
Ted, I'll check in with you when you're back in town, and we'll grab some lunch., ok?
Until next time!
vrgard
Well-known
Roland's "Elvis" camera. Yep, I definitely liked that one. Nothing more need be said there, however!
And hey, Ray, thanks for the reminder about the Rokkor. I just checked mine and it's straight as well!
Guess that helps explain why I've never had any trouble using it on any of my M cameras.
And yeah, Roland's quick load demonstration was interesting. Primarily because it appeared more involved than I expected. Just one more reason why I like my M4 so well - no spool to have to mess with!
I agree, Roland, that Mike's Leica III was mighty sweet. Now I keep thinking it would be fun to play with a LTM Barnack camera (as if I needed another camera...).
Again, it was great seeing everyone and playing with all the cameras. We'll have to do it again soon.
-Randy
And hey, Ray, thanks for the reminder about the Rokkor. I just checked mine and it's straight as well!
And yeah, Roland's quick load demonstration was interesting. Primarily because it appeared more involved than I expected. Just one more reason why I like my M4 so well - no spool to have to mess with!
I agree, Roland, that Mike's Leica III was mighty sweet. Now I keep thinking it would be fun to play with a LTM Barnack camera (as if I needed another camera...).
Again, it was great seeing everyone and playing with all the cameras. We'll have to do it again soon.
-Randy
ferider
Veteran
OK, for the others, this is "Elvis":
Hmm ... well at least I don't have to carry extra spools around

vrgard said:And yeah, Roland's quick load demonstration was interesting. Primarily because it appeared more involved than I expected. Just one more reason why I like my M4 so well - no spool to have to mess with!
Hmm ... well at least I don't have to carry extra spools around
vrgard
Well-known
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
ferider said:OK, for the others, this is "Elvis":
![]()
....
ah ha! So Elvis hasn't left the building, he's in the Camera and Coffee thread!!
.
vrgard
Well-known
grainhound
Well-known
Good to see the photos; I'd have liked to join you. I've just posted three from the Sept. 23rd meet in T.O., taken with the cine film I got in the trade with Rich for APX 100. I didn't think about which developer to use until I had the film immersed in a tank full of Rodinal. Luckily, I like the results, though I suspect there's a little operator error going on - especially with a couple I haven't posted.
Page 7 has all the photos so far; my 3 are in post 167: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44273&page=7
Page 7 has all the photos so far; my 3 are in post 167: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44273&page=7
ampguy
Veteran
Very nice Randy
Very nice Randy
Hope my roll w/scans will be ready tomorrow night or Wed.
Very nice Randy
Hope my roll w/scans will be ready tomorrow night or Wed.
vrgard said:Here's a few shots from our gathering:
-Randy
P.S. FYI - that's Mike (MikeL) & Roland (ferider), then Carl (cmogi10) , then Martin (?) & Ted (ampguy).
MikeL
Go Fish
Nikkor 35mm f1.8
Nikkor 35mm f1.8
Okay, it took two self-deleted posts before I figured out you couldn’t link photos into the page in the club forum. That Mike, he sure is a special one. Anyways, here are a few from that cool S3 and 35mm f1.8 that someone brought. I can’t remember who....
I’d be glad to remove any photos due to FBI restrictions, or any more scrupulous reasons.
Randy thinking of his DR summicron, and maybe beer:
Randy
Carl with a J-3 on his M8, with what appears to be people laughing behind him at the camera-lens combo, or more likely, laughing at the guys around the table:
Carl and J-3
Here’s Carl getting tired of Roland talking about how great the M2 is:
Carl and Roland
Ted doesn't believe there's actually a camera (dlux 2) somewhere in Ray's hands:
Ted
Here's a nice moment when Ray offered to develop and scan Ted's black-and-white film. What a nice guy. Ted's already shot 8 rolls of Tri-X this weekend!
Free developing!
There's always one guy with an LCD screen.....
M8
And last, here's Ray. Just before the brawl. Ooooo, that was a kicker, I say.
Ray pre-brawl
Cheers all,
Mike
Nikkor 35mm f1.8
Okay, it took two self-deleted posts before I figured out you couldn’t link photos into the page in the club forum. That Mike, he sure is a special one. Anyways, here are a few from that cool S3 and 35mm f1.8 that someone brought. I can’t remember who....
I’d be glad to remove any photos due to FBI restrictions, or any more scrupulous reasons.
Randy thinking of his DR summicron, and maybe beer:
Randy
Carl with a J-3 on his M8, with what appears to be people laughing behind him at the camera-lens combo, or more likely, laughing at the guys around the table:
Carl and J-3
Here’s Carl getting tired of Roland talking about how great the M2 is:
Carl and Roland
Ted doesn't believe there's actually a camera (dlux 2) somewhere in Ray's hands:
Ted
Here's a nice moment when Ray offered to develop and scan Ted's black-and-white film. What a nice guy. Ted's already shot 8 rolls of Tri-X this weekend!
Free developing!
There's always one guy with an LCD screen.....
M8
And last, here's Ray. Just before the brawl. Ooooo, that was a kicker, I say.
Ray pre-brawl
Cheers all,
Mike
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Loved the commentary!
ferider
Veteran
cmogi10 said:
Loved the commentary!
did you now ? You were just tired of hearing how great Elvis was with
your 90/2 !
Great pics everybody, thanks Mike !
Roland.
Honus
carpe diem
Sorry I missed it, although I didn't appreciate the telephone call from Ray at 2 am requesting bail money
Hopefully I can make the next one, but I'm so far behind I haven't even posted pics from the August get-together :bang:
Hopefully I can make the next one, but I'm so far behind I haven't even posted pics from the August get-together :bang:
ampguy
Veteran
Here's my film roll:
http://matsumura.smugmug.com/gallery/3581847#203443758
I noticed something interesting - my photos are pretty much underexposed with the film I used (about 1 month out-dated Fuji 400 True Definition - processed and scanned at Costco) --
The photos I took are about a 1/2 or 1 stop underexposed, but those taken by others are closer to accurate.
I think I'm used to seeing where the meter is selecting, and then bumping down slightly underexposing. I can get by with this with some films like Fuji 200, and of course digital, but low light, and this film seems to favor overexposure ?? Any other thoughts??
http://matsumura.smugmug.com/gallery/3581847#203443758
I noticed something interesting - my photos are pretty much underexposed with the film I used (about 1 month out-dated Fuji 400 True Definition - processed and scanned at Costco) --
The photos I took are about a 1/2 or 1 stop underexposed, but those taken by others are closer to accurate.
I think I'm used to seeing where the meter is selecting, and then bumping down slightly underexposing. I can get by with this with some films like Fuji 200, and of course digital, but low light, and this film seems to favor overexposure ?? Any other thoughts??
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Honus said:Sorry I missed it, although I didn't appreciate the telephone call from Ray at 2 am requesting bail money![]()
...
I couldn't get Robert to swap that 50 'lux for my freedom! I got out by promising the jail that I would perform a year's worth of b&w film processing.
Fun shots, throughout!
Mike, I forgot about the little D-lux.
MikeL
Go Fish
ampguy said:The photos I took are about a 1/2 or 1 stop underexposed, but those taken by others are closer to accurate.
Hi Ted,
I was at f2, 1/30 for just about all of mine, Delta 400, DD-X 1:1, 9 min.
ampguy
Veteran
Hi Mike
Hi Mike
I think this is a film specific thing. I recall even being at 1/15th, f2 with the 400 film for a few shots. I think the specific film I used may have been old or the costco developing not optimal.
If you browse on Smugmug, check my recent Fuji 200 with hex 50 and v4 preasph 35 cron film photos, incredibly great photo quality by exposing right on the meter, or a tad over.
Have a Voit. shoe mounted meter to play with later this week.
Hi Mike
I think this is a film specific thing. I recall even being at 1/15th, f2 with the 400 film for a few shots. I think the specific film I used may have been old or the costco developing not optimal.
If you browse on Smugmug, check my recent Fuji 200 with hex 50 and v4 preasph 35 cron film photos, incredibly great photo quality by exposing right on the meter, or a tad over.
Have a Voit. shoe mounted meter to play with later this week.
MikeL said:Hi Ted,
I was at f2, 1/30 for just about all of mine, Delta 400, DD-X 1:1, 9 min.
ampguy
Veteran
touched up a bit
touched up a bit
I opened up the original ~3MB scans into Picasa, hit "feeling lucky" on the set, and they came out pretty good. Reduced the sizes, but let me know if you want originals and I'll export as full size:
http://matsumura.smugmug.com/gallery/3588093#203876177
touched up a bit
I opened up the original ~3MB scans into Picasa, hit "feeling lucky" on the set, and they came out pretty good. Reduced the sizes, but let me know if you want originals and I'll export as full size:
http://matsumura.smugmug.com/gallery/3588093#203876177
ampguy said:I think this is a film specific thing. I recall even being at 1/15th, f2 with the 400 film for a few shots. I think the specific film I used may have been old or the costco developing not optimal.
If you browse on Smugmug, check my recent Fuji 200 with hex 50 and v4 preasph 35 cron film photos, incredibly great photo quality by exposing right on the meter, or a tad over.
Have a Voit. shoe mounted meter to play with later this week.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.