dmr
Registered Abuser
Ok, gang, tell me if you think this wild idea is workable, or if you think I'm on drugs! 🙂 🙂 🙂
I want to be able to shoot 1600 film in the GIII, but the ASA/ISO setting only goes up to 800, as some of you have noted.
I was thinking about trying a calibration of the meter against one I know was good (I still don't know how accurate this one is -- it does have the "wrong" battery, but the readings I get on it seem sane) when a thought came to me ... What would be stopping me from intentionally mis-calibrating it by one stop, such that when the ASA/ISO dial says 800 it would really be set to expose for 1600, and a setting of 200 would really be exposing for 400, etc.?
Has anybody ever tried something like this? (If so, any luck?)
Can anybody think of any reason this wouldn't work, or have nasty side-effects?
TIA, gang! 🙂
I want to be able to shoot 1600 film in the GIII, but the ASA/ISO setting only goes up to 800, as some of you have noted.
I was thinking about trying a calibration of the meter against one I know was good (I still don't know how accurate this one is -- it does have the "wrong" battery, but the readings I get on it seem sane) when a thought came to me ... What would be stopping me from intentionally mis-calibrating it by one stop, such that when the ASA/ISO dial says 800 it would really be set to expose for 1600, and a setting of 200 would really be exposing for 400, etc.?
Has anybody ever tried something like this? (If so, any luck?)
Can anybody think of any reason this wouldn't work, or have nasty side-effects?
TIA, gang! 🙂