f16sunshine
Moderator
Russia should buy Leica.
Or maybe they would just simply invade 😛
Russia should buy Leica.
Not that reliable a source. When I was at the introduction of the Monochrom in Berlin the Portuguese factory was already finalized and the money invested.
Beginning with the M8's arrival, I could afford a new digital M body. I look forward a time when I can judge the M digital body to be a competitive, value-added purchase. The money is in the bank waiting to be spent.
Russia should buy Leica.
i dind´t know the T line was a failure..might be interesting to know what are the reasosn for that.
But i think as said before, Leica should go for a partnership with Apple. there Leica can reach a sensible market with enough money to throw in.
i dind´t know the T line was a failure..might be interesting to know what are the reasosn for that.
When someone buys a Ferrari, they're not thinking it's a competitive, value-added purchase. Leica is a luxury item catering to a smaller group of well heeled photographers.
If it were anything but a luxury item, it would be out of business.
Quite. But all too many people can't tell quality from luxury. "If I can't afford it or don't appreciate it, then it's a pointless luxury bought only by the stoopid rich". Never cared much for Barbour but I've got a Billingham Ventile jacket that must be at least as old as your Barbour.Some people buy expensive cars because they enjoy the driving experience. Some people buy them for status symbols. Some people buy them because they plan to keep them for at least a decade.
Value-added business plans certainly include luxury items. But all value-added products are not luxury items. Leica lenses are not luxury items. They are valued added products because one is paying for superior engineering, materials and performance.
Just because a product sells for the highest price in the market does not necessarily mean it is a luxury item. Clothing is a prime example. One can pay high prices primarily to own a status symbol. Or one can pay high prices for quality. I have a 20 year old Burberry dry-waxed, canvas field jacket that was double the cost of most other rain coats. But it is still in excellent shape in spite of heavy use. That coat will out last me.
Not that reliable a source. When I was at the introduction of the Monochrom in Berlin the Portuguese factory was already finalized and the money invested.
View Post
The business model is flawed, they had to sell 3,500 MM to recoup their money on that R&D/build...they sold 3 times that amount, but then open the new Portugal factory at a cost of 65 million Euro, but here is the cherry...Kaufmann funds the build, Leica then pay him rent....and Blackstone allow this?
... I'm struggling with 'value added product' concept I have to admit.
What distinguishes a value added product from, well ... a product?
[...]value added refers to "extra" feature(s) of an item of interest (product, service, person etc.) that go beyond the standard expectations and provide something "more", even if the cost is higher to the client or purchasor.[...] Value-added features give competitive edges to companies with otherwise more expensive products.
Russia...should make a Leica ...240 M copy...