Is their any Ilford XP2 Super love out there?

Say what? Any examples? Sounds intriguing!

Well, I've recently seen examples at our fotoclub. One friend there has done it. He said that at the market introduction at that time Ilford officially gave some hints about that.
The results are not 'real' BW slides with white, grey tones and black, but more 'monochrome' results being blue / greenish.

You will find some examples at flickr, for example:

http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=XP2+E6&f=hp

I will try it by myself as soon as I find more time (some projects have to be finished before...).

Cheers, Jan
 
chanel.jpg


fuji gw690 iii with xp2
 
I really dig XP2's tonality. I like it better than BW400CN, but it's harder to work with.

If it's done well, it mimics well exposed/developed tri-x, to my eye (I realize this may incite minor riots of metaphor). However, I seem to think that the exposure latitude is somewhat less than Kodak BW400CN, which seems surprising--one would think it would be more because it is a closer cousin to silver.

Also, and this may seem odd in light of my previous statement, XP2 does not do well when underexposed (in my experience)--I always seem to shoot at box speed, and afterward, I always wish I'd gone a half or a whole stop over.

And another thing, I notice that the Nortisu mini-lab scanners tend to intensify the grain of the film--as evidenced by these two recent shots.

7261312116_15cca244de_c.jpg


7261311866_7a92669f6f_c.jpg


These were both shot with an M2 and a Nokton 50mm f/1.5. Open shade, slightly overcast, midday, and, if I recall correctly, at around f/2 or perhaps wide open at f/1.5. I may have used a neutral density filter--in fact I'm almost sure of it.
 
LOVE, let's call it a Possible Addiction

I could Shoot ALL of you in this Thread...dang, All Your Fault

Because I think I might be Hooked on IT
Just because of those Rich Inky Blacks ... Sublime !!

Ouch at $7.00 a roll
But I will Buy some

How does HC110 stand to 'Look' with XP2
since I want to try it at home ...😉. ???
 
just bought another dozen rolls 135-24. it's what i use for the nikon F, leica m4-2 and rollei 35s. the walgreens down the street processes it for me, negatives only for $4@roll, in 20 minutes and does a decent job. i scan it with a nikon coolscan V.


Leica M4-2 + Skopar 35mm f/2.5
 
"Looks"-wise, these C41 process films are wonderful - as evident here. I was always partial to the Kodak stuff over the Ilford variation - just find it "creamier" but both are fine. However, you really can't push/pull them as you can with self-development or perform your own development mojo using them obviously... kinda half the fun if you're still into black and white development.
 
There's some very nice examples in this thread.

I never really saw the attraction of B&W c41 films, but I had a roll of XP2 kicking about that I'd bought a while back and shot it thinking I'd drop it off at a minilab.

In the end, I developed it myself in Rodinal 1:25 and I was really pleased with it:
7151951353_7435c8c5e0_c.jpg


When I put in another order for B&W film, XP2 will be higher on my list.
 
How on earth do you guys get XP2 to look like this?

I'm guessing you're not shooting it at box speed?

I'd really like to support Ilford as they're relatively local to me, but every time I shoot XP2 it looks a horrendous mess with more grain than detail.

Shooting the Kodak version comes out with beautiful tones (and it's cheaper) so what am I doing wrong with XP2?
 
Well, XP-2 was my principal go-to chromogenic for a long time:

U758I1180244354.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1173508690.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1173764625.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1173509373.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1246420885.SEQ.0.jpg



However, during that period when XP-2 was frequently out of stock (during ilford's corporate transition), I drifted toward Kodak BW400NC, and have pretty much stayed there:

U758I1288077924.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1281002513.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1288079412.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1281078058.SEQ.0.jpg


U758I1281078208.SEQ.0.jpg



For me, the principal advantages of XP-2 over BW400CN are its (relative) pushability and its relatively clear base, allowing it to be more easily wet-printed from; Textually speaking, I've come to have a slight preference for BW400 - Frank Van Riper argued that it was akin to Tri-X minus much of the grain, and, sacraligious as that might come off, I'm finally somewhat inclined to agree.

Of course, one of the big draws for me was price: up until recently, a 36-exposure roll of BW400 was a buck cheaper in these parts. Now it's pulled within fifty cents of XP-2 (according to Adorama).

As far as processing goes, I have a wonderful little lab a few blocks from me (Accurate Photo) that turns arond my processing lightning quick; as usual, I have them process the film, then hand it back uncut. All scanning/tweaking/printing is done at Atelier Tiny here at home (now a bit tinier).

I do still shoot XP-2 from time to time, on the rare occasion when The Usual Suspects are out of Kodak stock. I'm ratehr behind in my scanning n' editing, but I'll have new examples of my work with the stuff sometime in July.


- Barrett
 
ilfrod xp-2 love it.
 

Attachments

  • 7033565519_bced73cd14_z.jpg
    7033565519_bced73cd14_z.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 7085854123_bdb12e12a9.jpg
    7085854123_bdb12e12a9.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 0
I really like using XP2, mostly I load it in the Leica when I am wandering around just shooting for fun. There is a decent iPhone lightmeter app, scoring a roll of 36 for about 6 bucks, then dropping it off at Costco for 2.99 developing and about 3 bucks in 5x7 prints maybe deemed sacrilege by some...

7408564058_9d3c2a56bc_b.jpg


7408571594_517eac399b_b.jpg
 
Wolluk-Stock festival 2012
WS110704.jpg


WS110710.jpg


Leica IIIa + 90mm Elmar + Y2 filter and half a stop over-exposure

I haven't shot any XP2 lately, really need to get some again when my stash of FP4+ and ADOX films runs out. 😉
 
Back
Top Bottom