Photo_Smith
Well-known
I voted 100% film although I have some digital so probably 90% is a better figure.
Despite being a digital camera user for over 16 years (sounds a long time) I have never really warmed to the way digital cameras render a scene, sure you can work hard to approximate it but while it film exists and is cheap (although not as plentiful as 10 years ago) in the country I live—why bother?
Where I currently stand
Recently I sold the unloved D700 and all the lenses and decided to concentrate on mainly medium format with two Rolleiflex cameras, 35mm with the old M4P and Nikons F2 and Nikkormat EL.
EDIT: Forgot about the Sinar 4x5!
Film is cheap where I live, the Nikons are mainly fed a diet of colour negative film from Poundland (£1 a roll) with the occasional slide film (about £5 a roll) these prices are way cheaper than when I started photography in 1978.
I have kept three digital cameras an old Nikon D2x which I use with manual Nikon lenses, A pocket snap camera the Fuji F10 and a Polaroid POGO camera that prints 2x3" instant images.
The Future
I'm like most film users happy with the quality and price I pay for being able to continue using my chosen medium but have half an eye on the future.
I think the next 2-3 years will be critical for the future of film particularly the infrastructure of labs and processing options at the moment its good, however the amount of doom and gloom spread by an increasingly large demographic can get to you.
Like most people B&W looks at least safe and you can develop it in pretty much any organic phenol with an alkaline base, Ilford seem to be committed and that will keep me using their materials.
As much as I dislike digital colour, I try out many different cameras the most recent being the Fuji X1 pro which has had a few great offers like free lenses, but I'm afraid the camera felt too clunky and the output was disappointing, a shame because I really wanted to like it and it is small, stylish and reasonably priced.
I think possibly the digital camera for me has yet to be made, so I keep using film as long as possible.
Despite being a digital camera user for over 16 years (sounds a long time) I have never really warmed to the way digital cameras render a scene, sure you can work hard to approximate it but while it film exists and is cheap (although not as plentiful as 10 years ago) in the country I live—why bother?
Where I currently stand
Recently I sold the unloved D700 and all the lenses and decided to concentrate on mainly medium format with two Rolleiflex cameras, 35mm with the old M4P and Nikons F2 and Nikkormat EL.
EDIT: Forgot about the Sinar 4x5!
Film is cheap where I live, the Nikons are mainly fed a diet of colour negative film from Poundland (£1 a roll) with the occasional slide film (about £5 a roll) these prices are way cheaper than when I started photography in 1978.
I have kept three digital cameras an old Nikon D2x which I use with manual Nikon lenses, A pocket snap camera the Fuji F10 and a Polaroid POGO camera that prints 2x3" instant images.
The Future
I'm like most film users happy with the quality and price I pay for being able to continue using my chosen medium but have half an eye on the future.
I think the next 2-3 years will be critical for the future of film particularly the infrastructure of labs and processing options at the moment its good, however the amount of doom and gloom spread by an increasingly large demographic can get to you.
Like most people B&W looks at least safe and you can develop it in pretty much any organic phenol with an alkaline base, Ilford seem to be committed and that will keep me using their materials.
As much as I dislike digital colour, I try out many different cameras the most recent being the Fuji X1 pro which has had a few great offers like free lenses, but I'm afraid the camera felt too clunky and the output was disappointing, a shame because I really wanted to like it and it is small, stylish and reasonably priced.
I think possibly the digital camera for me has yet to be made, so I keep using film as long as possible.