yehh... sample images lack micro-contast...smearsd texture...can't see t' skin pores...never got that wif t' old GRD...what else can you Xpect from Oly...
Sample images are meaningless...wait til people get them in their hands, that's when the images will count.
padraigm
Established
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Ouch.. that's kind of pricey - I'll wait to see what the size/reviews are like 
Thanks for the link,
Dave
Thanks for the link,
Dave
padraigm
Established
I am actually excited about this product. Having my wide angle rangefinder lenses that are slow but with the built in image stabilization makes them so much more useful. Just looking at the specs it seems to really put pressure on the DP2. The IS and interchangeable lenses is huge IMHO.
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
I am actually excited about this product. Having my wide angle rangefinder lenses that are slow but with the built in image stabilization makes them so much more useful. Just looking at the specs it seems to really put pressure on the DP2. The IS and interchangeable lenses is huge IMHO.
Will wides (and uber wides - say the CV 15mm) be usable in the Micro 4/3 body? I keep thinking about how deep the rear of such lenses protrude into the body.
Cheers,
Dave
sevres_babylone
Veteran
Dave, I just did a quick flickr post and came up with this one with the CV 12mm on the G1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/poli8x10/3333137019/Will wides (and uber wides - say the CV 15mm) be usable in the Micro 4/3 body?
That photographer, poli8x10 has pictures with a number of lenses on the G1. Go to his second page. The first one is mostly Canon stuff.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/poli8x10/
ampguy
Veteran
Here's what I think is nice about this camera: WB bracketing. Do the LX3 or DP2 have this?
What it is missing is dedicated Sepia mode. You have to capture in some other mode, then convert.
What it is missing is dedicated Sepia mode. You have to capture in some other mode, then convert.
aizan
Veteran
omg, i hope the rumor on top about the more advanced model having an evf isn't true.
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
I like the look of the silver and black one, but maybe Panasonic will come out with a version that's all black. Then it might be time to get rid of the old Sony P&S.
mich8261
Well-known
Doesn't the micro 4/3rd sensor turn a 15mm lens into a 30mm equivalent field of view? How has Oly addressed this issue in their regular 4/3rd dSLRs?Will wides (and uber wides - say the CV 15mm) be usable in the Micro 4/3 body? I keep thinking about how deep the rear of such lenses protrude into the body.
Cheers,
Dave
ywenz
Veteran
George S.
How many is enough?
I like the look of the silver and black one, but maybe Panasonic will come out with a version that's all black. Then it might be time to get rid of the old Sony P&S.
There is a photo of a black one out there, I saw it earlier today. Dunno if it's real tho....
250swb
Well-known
Will wides (and uber wides - say the CV 15mm) be usable in the Micro 4/3 body? I keep thinking about how deep the rear of such lenses protrude into the body.
Cheers,
Dave
Well maybe not all legacy lenses, but you would need an adapter as well that would take up some distance. And that 15mm would only work out as 30mm, so not wide anyway. But Panasonic have a 7-14mm m4/3 lens that will fit (14-28mm equiv.). Is that wide enough?
Steve
BillBingham2
Registered User
B2 (;->
Tuolumne
Veteran
Marry this with the AF, EVF and LCD of the G1 and you'd finally have a great digital camera.
/T
/T
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Trius, it wasn't a goal, but if you have to hang it off your shoulder, what's the real advantage?
An M, even a CLE, is not pocketable. Of course, no one has yet defined a "standard pocket" ... ages ago when I sold computers, we tried to get Arrow Shirt to add 3.5" floppy drives to the Compaq "lunchbox" portables they were ordering, as 3.5" floppy disks easily fit into shirt pockets. Their response, of course, was that they could make pockets any size they wished.
My point was that everyone who whines... er, complains ... about what this camera is NOT is not thinking about what Olympus intends it to be. It is what it is, and for me the possibility of digital street camera that is not TOO small, has good image quality, can take lenses in just about any mount ever made is pretty damn interesting.
And as Mr. Watanabe said, their market research shows a lot of people are looking for something in this class. The follow-on models (and lenses) may well draw in a lot of the undecideds of that 20% who are looking for things such as the EVF.
And as for "hanging on your shoulder" ... there are other solutions for anyone who is creative.
Last edited:
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
It is what it is, and for me the possibility of digital street camera that is not TOO small, has good image quality, can take lenses in just about any mount ever made is pretty damn interesting.
I think Earl has a point. Nowadays it doesn't have to be "tiny" to be a good inconspicuous street camera. Hold it out in front of you like any tourist taking a photo of someone flashing a "peace" sign and you're good as gold.
Mind you, I'm still waiting for an official price and review - because @ $900 USD for the camera with the 17mm lens; I'm just gonna say... "ouch" it's a bit much.
CHeers,
Dave
sojournerphoto
Veteran
I think Earl has a point. Nowadays it doesn't have to be "tiny" to be a good inconspicuous street camera. Hold it out in front of you like any tourist taking a photo of someone flashing a "peace" sign and you're good as gold.
Mind you, I'm still waiting for an official price and review - because @ $900 USD for the camera with the 17mm lens; I'm just gonna say... "ouch" it's a bit much.
CHeers,
Dave
Yes, I've been having thoughts that the best and most appropriate way to document lives now - and I am not thinking of 'street' so much as documentary work (ducks and runs for cover...) - is with a small but capable digital camera. My 5D and 1Ds3 are big, black and intimidating in the sort of social situation I am thinking abuot, as well as being heavy to tote. Film rf's are from the past - I love them, but they are not now. When I make a black and white rpint from film I am told that it looks 'old fashioned', so brings an extra layer of value judgement to the work (this is not an aesthetic argument). Hence a decent digi may be the answer, and the Oly Pen looks to me to be the best compromise for this purpose so far.
Just some thoughts.
Mike
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I am glad that Olympus is making the digital PEN into a range of cameras.
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.u...s_planned_update_16_June_5pm_news_284586.html
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.u...s_planned_update_16_June_5pm_news_284586.html
NickTrop
Veteran
Didn't read all 21 pages - so sorry if this is old news, but here's a recent article:
http://www.popsci.com/gear-amp-gadg...mpuss-new-rangefinder-inspired-digital-camera
Here's another article:
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=4013&review=olympus+ep1
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=4017&review=olympus+ep1
Seems like a great camera... BUT, it doesn't seem to have a viewfinder at all? Just an LCD screen like cheap digicams?
http://www.popsci.com/gear-amp-gadg...mpuss-new-rangefinder-inspired-digital-camera
Here's another article:
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=4013&review=olympus+ep1
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=4017&review=olympus+ep1
Seems like a great camera... BUT, it doesn't seem to have a viewfinder at all? Just an LCD screen like cheap digicams?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.