comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
As the title may suggest, I just got my HB imarect copy from Popflash photo, and I was wonder exactly how it worked... it's mostly the lines. I take it that I match up the long lines with the long lines, and short lines with the short... but what about the 85mm? Do I match it up with the short, or the long?
btw, it looks great on the Zorkis
btw, it looks great on the Zorkis
iñaki
Well-known
Sorry, I have no idea, but I would love to see a photo of the imarect on the zorki 3
I need a 35mm finder or a multifinder for my zorki 3m. Is Popflash selling them or it was only that one (I can not find it in his web).
I need a 35mm finder or a multifinder for my zorki 3m. Is Popflash selling them or it was only that one (I can not find it in his web).
kbg32
neo-romanticist
There is no dial/markings on the outside that correspond to the focal length you are using?
comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
Yes, there are focal length markings, but some have long lines and some have short leading to the numbers. The setting ring has two lines next to each other - one long and one short.
Popflash had it up in the RFF classifieds, and it did not last long up there. I don't know if they have any more but I bet if you e-mail them they'd be happy to check.
Popflash had it up in the RFF classifieds, and it did not last long up there. I don't know if they have any more but I bet if you e-mail them they'd be happy to check.
raid
Dad Photographer
Maybe they are for infrared photography?
I am saying this because the Imarect should have a close-up and distant lever. If not, then one line is for close distnace and one for long distance.
Raid
I am saying this because the Imarect should have a close-up and distant lever. If not, then one line is for close distnace and one for long distance.
Raid
OldNick
Well-known
I would suggest the following: some of the marks lead up to an inscripted number, such as the 85mm mark; the mark before the 85 is for the 73/75 focal length; the one following the 85 is for 90mm. The others appear to be self-explanatory. The long index mark on the rotating part is for normal shooting, while the shorter index is for closeups. Use the cam beneath the finder to adjust for parallax.
Jim N.
Jim N.
comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
Thanks Oldnick.
comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
The fixed ring just behind the "snout" has focal lengths marked on it. The rotating knurled ring behind it has two lines marked on it, one shorter than the other. The long one should be set against the focal length in use for far distances (30 ft. and over), the short one should be used for near distances (6 ft. and under). The recommendation that a point between the two lines should be used for distances betwen 6 ft. and 30 ft. is not so practical, since there is little space. You will see that this ring changes field size slightly. Many people, to be on the safe side, always use the short line.
To adjust for parallax, you use the control just below the eye-piece. Move it to the right for infinity, to the left for closest focus. You will see that when it is exactly in the middle, it is set to a shade under 7 ft. For much of the time I leave it there, just tilting the camera upwards a little when photographing something closer and tilting it downwards when dealing with something farther away. To benefit from the precision of which the finder is capable, specially with longer lenses, it is best to use the markings.
I have spoken of the VIOOH I have. These things were not completely standardised, and variations are possible. The principles remain the same.
To adjust for parallax, you use the control just below the eye-piece. Move it to the right for infinity, to the left for closest focus. You will see that when it is exactly in the middle, it is set to a shade under 7 ft. For much of the time I leave it there, just tilting the camera upwards a little when photographing something closer and tilting it downwards when dealing with something farther away. To benefit from the precision of which the finder is capable, specially with longer lenses, it is best to use the markings.
I have spoken of the VIOOH I have. These things were not completely standardised, and variations are possible. The principles remain the same.
comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
Thanks.... In a fit of boredom at 12 in the morning, I found the instructions and took the finder apart and cleaned it. Much better!
I have heard complaints on occasion about the tele settings being useless on the finder, but I like it... it gives you a good idea what the proportions will be like when you print it.
I have heard complaints on occasion about the tele settings being useless on the finder, but I like it... it gives you a good idea what the proportions will be like when you print it.
iñaki
Well-known
comp_wiz101 said:Here's the picture we've all been waiting for.... the Zorki 3 with an Imarect copy!
P.S....is my "studio" lighting improving at all?
Thank you for the picture. It looks cool with the zorki3
comp_wiz101
Compulsive Tinkerer
Thanks. I used an ancient Sony Mavica "floppy disk" camera with a "soft box" made from holding a sheet of paper in front fo a halogen bulb in a desk lamp.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.