just got tons of 35mm, need a better SLR

[BLKRCAT]

I read about half of this thread and I've read enough.

I'm not sure why one would want a whole new SLR. Really apart from the functions (which the OP never specified were important) they are all just light tight boxes that expose film.

If it were me I would spend my SLR cash on lenses. Get some better glass and your images will look better compared to lesser quality glass. There is no point in switching over to a new system when you are partially invested into one already. You may end up with a better body but same quality glass because you've spent all your cash on a fancier light tight box that exposes film. Your images could look very similar in the short run.

 

[CliveC]

I'm not sure why one would want a whole new SLR. Really apart from the functions (which the OP never specified were important) they are all just light tight boxes that expose film.

I'm coming to this conclusion as well, however, some later ones do offer some benefits, including autofocus. Also, more SLRs using different mounts means access to more lenses, so the point is not completely moot.

 

[Ronald_H]

The F100 is considered one of the best SLRs ever made, and considering what they cost these days, it would be great for your needs. I have never owned one though.

The slightly older F90x is also great and a reliable tool that I have been using with great pleasure for about a year now. However, I plan on selling it, because it is limited with G lenses and does not support VR. I already found a dirt, dirt cheap F80 that can do all those tricks.

My favorite Nikon though would be the FM. All mechanical, very solid, very cheap and can use non AI lenses.

As you might imagine, on 'film days' I usually carry the F90x (for modern glass) and the FM (for old primes). Together they cost me 115 euros, so still dirt cheap.

Cheers,

Ronald

 

[Mr. Fizzlesticks]

When you get a little older you will understand that the grass isn't greener on the other side of the fence, it is greener where it gets watered....

 

[bosco]

was not expecting all of this feedback, thanks everyone!

 

[farlymac]

I used to shoot motocross with a Nikkormat FTn back in the early '70s. So it can be done with a simple set-up, though auto-focus would really be nice to have for that. Try to get your hands on the camera you decide on before you buy it. And try several to see what you would really like.

PF

 

[oftheherd]

I used to shoot motocross with a Nikkormat FTn back in the early '70s. So it can be done with a simple set-up, though auto-focus would really be nice to have for that. Try to get your hands on the camera you decide on before you buy it. And try several to see what you would really like.

PF

Best answer so far imho. I generally avoid threads about the decisive moment, but I think farlymac would tell you that a slight variation of that concept was what he often went for. Also focusing where he expected the action to be, and snapping the shot when it was there.

That works. Get the camera you like most and learn how to get the photos you want with it. Later, you might consider another camera with features you will have decided might be more convenient.