Just Published: California Dreaming

NY_Dan

Well-known
Local time
3:31 AM
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
1,289
Location
New York City area
tumblr_ny8w9nzLnB1r916qao1_1280.jpg


Hi. Many fellow RFF members may know of my trip to Los Angeles, California this past September. I was there from 9/19 to 9/26/2015. I shot about 75 rolls of Kodak 120 Tri-X. I used a Rolleiflex 2.8f, Rolleiwide, and Fuji 690 wide. Processed with Tmax, scanned with a Nikon 9000, and adjusted in PhotoShop.

Back in 1981 I worked as a photo assistant in LA -- it was a great experience. My father lived in LA at the time, and he died in a bus in 1987 at the same age I am now. That was one of the reasons I wanted to go shoot in LA -- I had so many memories and photos in my head. I also needed something to do to relax while waiting for my book Never Seeing Nothing (inkBooks) to come out in mid October. Plus, I wrote a novel (seeking representation) that takes place in LA, and I wanted to visit and photograph the places I wrote about. I literally am California dreaming.

Please click on the title to view California Dreaming.

All things considered, I think the book came out very well. I hope a few people buy an e-book copy as it will help with film costs on my next photo adventure. Thank you. Oh, and please comment and ask questions.
 
Thanks for looking! 🙂 Wish I'd shot more when I lived in LA for three or four months back in 1981. 1 week is a good start -- LA is an interesting place for street and landscape photography.
 
impressive, and more impressive because all taken during just a 2 weeks stay! very well done, to say the least
 
Dan, I just looked at your book. The images are great… great examples of street photography well done. And as others have said, the pairings are just super!

I'd be very much interested in buying a copy of the book if it was priced like most other bound books of this genre ($40 to $60 range).
 
Dan, I just looked at your book. The images are great… great examples of street photography well done. And as others have said, the pairings are just super!

I'd be very much interested in buying a copy of the book if it was priced like most other bound books of this genre ($40 to $60 range).

Hey Jamie,

Thanks. I appreciate your comments, Peter's, and everyone else who was kind enough to take the time to look and/or supply feedback.

Yeah, Blurb books are expensive. There is a code for 40 percent off until 12/1. However, my book Never Seeing Nothing -- is much better, just came out, and is only $38. Printed in Iceland on great paper, Duotones, cloth cover, etc. You can see and buy it at http://www.inkphotobooks.com

Here are two more LA photos shot 9/19/2015 on Hollywood Boulevard:
tumblr_nyjdijJPdO1r916qao1_1280.jpg


tumblr_nyjdijJPdO1r916qao2_1280.jpg
 
Dan, I just looked at your book. The images are great… great examples of street photography well done. And as others have said, the pairings are just super!

I'd be very much interested in buying a copy of the book if it was priced like most other bound books of this genre ($40 to $60 range).

Hey Jamie,

I made an 8x10" softcover version that's only $56 you may be able to use promo code CREATIVE40 for 40 percent off by Dec 1 - they're always having sales. Here's link: http://www.blurb.com/books/6664764-california-dreaming

Still think my Never Seeing Nothing is better 🙂
 
Dan,

As an owner of your great NY book, I'd like to offer some constructive comment. I don't think the Blurb rendering of the photos (at least on the screen preview) is anything like what you have in the NY book. There seems to be a graininess that's just not there in the NY book. The images also don't seem to have anywhere near the tonality that the NY book does - most likely the duotones - but I'm not so familiar with Blurb production so maybe others can comment.

When I look at the two images you posted above, the tonality is definitely there. It's a smoothness of the midtowns coupled with deep detailed shadows that makes it for me.

I think one has to also consider that the NY book is from a longer time period and greater image pool, so it's a potentially stronger work since it has more source to edit from.

Overall, I like the images, but the above I describe for production differences is somewhat of a barrier when added to the Blurb price.

Thanks for giving us the link and sharing your work with us.
 
Hey fdarnell -- great comments. I posted my thoughts below to make it easier to follow:

Dan,

As an owner of your great NY book, I'd like to offer some constructive comment. I don't think the Blurb rendering of the photos (at least on the screen preview) is anything like what you have in the NY book. There seems to be a graininess that's just not there in the NY book. The images also don't seem to have anywhere near the tonality that the NY book does - most likely the duotones - but I'm not so familiar with Blurb production so maybe others can comment.

What you're seeing are the previews generated by Blurb to use less bandwidth -- an eBook, pdf, or printed piece would be better than the preview. And yes, absolutely -- the printing on Never Seeing Nothing, thanks to the printer (great paper and duotones), my publisher (inkBooks) and good scans -- is some of the best I've seen.

When I look at the two images you posted above, the tonality is definitely there. It's a smoothness of the midtowns coupled with deep detailed shadows that makes it for me.

Yes. And that's going from a 300 Dpi 30 x 30" or 45 x 30.5" grayscale tiff to a 1140 px or 20" 72 dpi rgb jpeg and saved for web at high 60 quality -- posted to Tumblr and websource url'd to here.

I think one has to also consider that the NY book is from a longer time period and greater image pool, so it's a potentially stronger work since it has more source to edit from.

Agree totally! I sent the publisher 650 photos (edited down from about 2000), taken over a 5-year period, 1800 rolls and then edited by publisher's partner to 95 photos -- so yeah, you can't compare to 1 week's output 75 rolls. The Blurb experience for me is about seeing what I got over a limited time frame, editing, and learning for the next one.

Overall, I like the images, but the above I describe for production differences is somewhat of a barrier when added to the Blurb price.

Definitely. My hope is some people would get the eBook for $9.99. But that never pans out. And paramount is always to share what I saw. I have a lot of history with LA, and I needed to spend a week there very badly -- it's hard to describe. I never expect anyone to get the Blurb book. I'm happy if they do. I made a softcover 8x10 version and ordered it today for myself with the 40% discount -- I like to have a printed copy of all my Blurb books for reference. Anyway, that's why $38 for the Never Seeing Nothing is such a good deal -- it's what the book cost to print, with packaging and incidentals. I don't make money on it. But it means a lot to me to help the publisher break even and be able to publish books with other photographers.

Thanks for giving us the link and sharing your work with us.

Thank you!

Best,
Dan
 
I like this very much Dan, I'm from California and see these scenes all the time. But I can't photos as good as these. Thanks.

Thanks. You definitely can get these scenes with a camera too, anyone can -- just get possessed for a few weeks, months or years -- or whatever it takes. I can be very single-minded. It's a blessing and a curse, and can really annoy those close to you.
 
Dan,

Out of curiosity on your compression comment, I went ahead and got the ebook version for the iPad. It's 41.3 mb on my Mac. Not sure how big your file was you uploaded. Seems like the best image is actually the one from the limited preview that is generated when you go to buy the book. That image is way better than the free preview and is still better than the ebook. I did a screen capture on the mac and the iPad and made a side by side comparison image using the LA city skyline image, which shows this difference pretty dramatically. PM me your email and I would be glad to send to you.

I would not post this comparison as it's not my work. I'll leave that up to you if you'd like.

Still like the eBook on the iPad as the images are better than the preview but I still think leaves a lot to be desired compared to the images you post here on RFF.
 
Dan,

Out of curiosity on your compression comment, I went ahead and got the ebook version for the iPad. It's 41.3 mb on my Mac. Not sure how big your file was you uploaded. Seems like the best image is actually the one from the limited preview that is generated when you go to buy the book. That image is way better than the free preview and is still better than the ebook. I did a screen capture on the mac and the iPad and made a side by side comparison image using the LA city skyline image, which shows this difference pretty dramatically. PM me your email and I would be glad to send to you.

I would not post this comparison as it's not my work. I'll leave that up to you if you'd like.

Still like the eBook on the iPad as the images are better than the preview but I still think leaves a lot to be desired compared to the images you post here on RFF.

Hmm, that's interesting. I'd never done a side by side comparison. I'm dan at danwagnerphotography dot com If you like, I can send you the pdf I downloaded and you can see how that compares. Thanks!
 
Amazing work Dan,

You are one of the group of photographers whose work has impressed me the most on this forum in recent times. HelenHill and Gabor also!

I was especially impressed with the large number of great shots that you had managed to get in such a short trip, but then there's something about Rolleiflexes that does yield a nice keeper rate I find. I am seriously debating getting rid of a lot of my other equipment and just going down to my two 2.8 Planars as my main kit this year. With two of them you still get 24 shots and I love the format so much.

Quick question, were these all carefully composed and focused in an orthodox fashion first on the ground glass (hard to do with fast action street work) or were you perhaps stopped down a lot in that sunshine with fast film and maybe using the sports finder to catch the action and relying on greater depth of field at times?

I tried using the sport finder approach with my Rolleis for the first time last year and found it was surprisingly accurate and easy to frame and compose plus there were not too many surprises when I devved the negs. Using a Rolleiflex sport finder close to your eye in such a fashion is actually quite like shooting with a Leica M. I am talking in terms of just quickly imagining the composition as you bring the camera to your eye and then putting subjects rapidly where you want them in the simple frame with everything shown in focus as you pull the trigger. I had always overlooked this option with these cameras until recently.

I found another good TLR technique is to 'go fishing' and find a good spot, look down and wait for things to come to you (perhaps whilst having it turned 90 degrees away from you for maximum stealth) also but I find that is a technique that I don't want to use all the time. Was just interested in your thoughts on the techniques for deploying a TLR for this sort of work in general really.

BTW, on the same theme, here's my latest street/candid Rolleiflex project from Bangkok:

http://www.chromacomaphoto.com/chaoprayaexpress/
 
Back
Top Bottom