Of course.
But "technical persons" can be photographers, too. If they couldn't, or weren't for sure, it would be so sad. Ditto for the contrary.
I don't think I have been performing some particular "rubenpicking". There is no "out of the blue" personal vendetta or whatever - sorry to get you off your victim's pedestal Ruben, but you are not the target I may drop my arrows at during my worst nightmares. I'm fine, and when I have a dream, you're not in it.
Yes I have written a kind of funny (well, to many people, according to the PMs I got) about you, beginning by "Once upon a time...". Had you got some casual sense of humour bits, you would have liked it.
You can write something similar about me, if you wish. Why not. Let's have fun.
To have to say it for the fourth time already, there is no "camera repair business for money" involved here. Sorry for those people (well, maybe it's only "that") still thinking so.
Long ago, there were many very interesting discussions on the Zeiss Contax forum here about either the prewar II and III Contax cameras, and about their postwar IIa and IIIa successors. Slowly but surely, that forum got emptied from its "substance" (to use Ruben's own words) because no discussion got possible without people suddenly coming in from nowhere and telling "Stop talk guys : there is one only thing you ought to do : send your camera to Henry Scherer for a two-years long repair time". So, many people finally left, leaving that forum as an empty shell, where nothing interesting would happen at all if some folks discussing about the Contax-G series (a modern and very different Kyocera-made autofocus Japanese Contax) didn't continue to post there.
Then Ruben, noticing this, launched a memorabilia thread titled "Questions to Contax owners" which was the fisrt of a large series of very strange (to stay within polite definitions) threads of his own, where we could read highly interesting data about the Kiev, the Contax and the "Kontax". So interesting that many of these threads, having turned into personal flame wars, got quickly locked down.
Not wanting to remain there, Ruben continued to abundantly write on the FSU forum. What did he write ? Mostly, some kind of Kiev-and-Apfefstrudel-based life "philosophy" (I have nothing against this, it's a free world).
Basically, he told us that the Kiev had the most silent focal plane shutter of all 24x36 cameras ever created, that the Kiev had some unique musing effects on him when he was shooting photos in the bus, etc. Nothing wrong with that, either.
Then, being left alone with his thoughts by many other people having participated to this forum a while ago, he posed himself as a tech. specialist of a new style, telling that the Kiev Survival Site was not written in a clearly enough way, asking for a "KSS for dummies", and suddenly discovering other ways to deal with well known tech. issues for which easy and working fixes were well known already.
When Jay complained about all his Kievs having been got useless by their suddenly broken shutter ribbons, instead of providing valid repair tips to Jay, he told that the problem was not the ribbons, but Jay's unability to love the Kievs as they deserved to be, with, as a consequance, bad feelings from Jay towards the Kievs and having made the cameras fail. Of course, of course.
I didn't launch any "out of the blue" "Sicilyian vendetta" against Ruben, whom I don't know and towards whom I have no reason to be "hostlyle" (I quote his own vocabulary).
I just put him up to date technically, because he deserved it well, and because it was time for him to be told certain things (I remember Ruben wanting to be offered two return tickets from his location to Italy for his "repair work" on the Kiev cameras of a torinese fellow here, which was just too funny).
I have never insulted Ruben so far, but Ruben didn't hesitate to do it towards me, clearly showing that "the nice guy", like all of us, has his own dark side.
If you don't like it Ruben, it's no problem with me. But I don't care about it, either.