Are you sure? That's not the answer I got when I googled your screen name. 😀
Hmmm, weird. Yep, I'm sure. Signed, Rodney Gorgy
Are you sure? That's not the answer I got when I googled your screen name. 😀
Sorry, but it feels wrong to me; however, I do agree that you were within your "rights". Juan, I can't comment on your work as there isn't a link in your sig and I don't see you having a gallery here on RFF.
I believe individual dignity, morality, and especially community are important considerations when conducting ourselves in public as photographers.
Would you have behaved and photographed in the same manner if you knew the girls, if they were neighbors, cousins or one your sister?
Juan, are you looking for your peers on RFF to legitimize your actions and style of shooting as a photographer?
If everyone ran around in this style, I think photographers would quickly find our "rights" being taken away.
One important consideration is the context in which an image is captured. Is it for a project or commissioned work, intended to be shared? For you personal archives?
The right way of things, if you want to try it one day, is that his behaviour made his name recognized.
And you are wrong about what you just said: lots of people here -unknown like myself- use our names.
Cheers,
Juan
I don't know you at all... If you want to see a few images you can find some spontaneous and quick low resolution scans at flickr Juan Valdenebro...
Sure, fine. I'm sure he's a great guy and deserves the recognition he gets.
This may be true, but the majority probably do not. Just look at this thread and you'll see more nickname style screen names than real names.
I'm not sure why I'm the bad guy here for trying to provide the other side of the coin i.e. that people aren't always going to be nice when you photograph them and that we (yes, me included) can be perceived, justifiably, in many ways by the people we choose to photograph on the street.
You may now understand why I see even 'jokes' as a bad idea. It's a world-picture. When I was a boy, we made racist jokes and thought nothing about it. Then the world changed, for the better, and we realized that it wasn't all that funny to insult someone on account of the colour. And now it's funny to insult someone because they're a photographer? No, thanks.
You didn't provide the other side of the coin: I did it on my first post. What's the sense in your saying "a girl got upset" after I said "a girl got upset"?
Cheers,
Juan
Fair enough. I'm sorry that happened to you and I'm sure I'd be very sensitive if it happened to me. I never meant to insult anyone here. I consider myself a photographer of sorts, so in reality I'd be on your side, and Juan's side, in each of the situations presented. That said, I do still think of the people who I am photographing and I totally understand when they get upset with people photographing them in public (as I see it a lot in NYC). It may be a right we have, but I have my own personal limits as well.
(Keep in mind: it's a fallacy to assume that a name is authentic just because it looks authentic.)
Dear David,Bugger, they finally discovered I really am David Bailey
Huh? I give up.
Huh? I give up.
I just find interesting listening to people's concepts, you included... How could I be interested in your comments on my photographs, or interested in your legitimation of my photographs, or in commenting with you how I use my images? I don't know you at all...
All I can think of you from your words is that you wouldn't be a good street photographer, even if you do a good photograph on the street sometimes...
You said I did wrong, fine, but it's interesting to see the lots of other things you needed to say...
Keep enjoying!
Cheers,
Juan
1.hmm, then why, in an open forum, start a thread and ask for opinions (e.g. "Am I wrong?"). Was it merely a rhetorical question? :bang:
2.Perhaps, but please describe "good street photographer" first. 🙄 Based on this thread, and another I recall where you described shooting on a dangerous "drug-corner", I only see one slice of what I consider a broader "street photography" genre.
3.The "other things" were meant to move the consideration & your reflection of the beach event beyond merely a question of "legal rights", and to think more broadly. I'm not quite sure I "needed" to say them, but I do believe they may be relevant in answering your [perceived] question of right & wrong from something more than a mere legal basis.
Absolutely! 🙂 And the same to you!
Dear David,
...AND that you lied about your age!
Cheers,
R.
It would be considered a manipulation of process to accuse someone of something they had already admitted ... sort of playing to the gallery
Ok, but I did nothing of the sort. My posts were not that simple and were more about not only thinking of photographer's rights, but those being photographed. That's all.