Kodak Medalist converted to 120- any market?

D

Dan Daniel

Well-known
Local time
1:16 AM
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
1,742
View My Gallery
I finally had time to go digging into a Kodak Medalist to see what would be involved in modifying the film chambers to work with 120. And I see a way to do it very cleanly. Basically you can machine out the film chambers and build a new wall with a larger diameter chamber for the 120 spool.

This does involve breaking down the camera to the bare frame to remove the film chamber parts. A good time to clean everything and get the full wind system, rangefinder, and shutter working well.

This would probably cost in the $300 to $500 range, including the overhaul. Camera itself, if I did it on spec, would add to the cost.

Just poking around to see what people think. Would you buy a converted Medalist? Would you send yours off to somebody to do this? Would you do it for $100 but no way for $500? Any comments appreciated!
 
Dan Daniel said:
I finally had time to go digging into a Kodak Medalist to see what would be involved in modifying the film chambers to work with 120. And I see a way to do it very cleanly. Basically you can machine out the film chambers and build a new wall with a larger diameter chamber for the 120 spool.

This does involve breaking down the camera to the bare frame to remove the film chamber parts. A good time to clean everything and get the full wind system, rangefinder, and shutter working well.

This would probably cost in the $300 to $500 range, including the overhaul. Camera itself, if I did it on spec, would add to the cost.

Just poking around to see what people think. Would you buy a converted Medalist? Would you send yours off to somebody to do this? Would you do it for $100 but no way for $500? Any comments appreciated!
Click to expand...

just re-spool 120 film on to 620 reels if the heavy old beast with a great lens is not going to be your go-to camera for your life-long film shooting.

300-500 dosh can still buy a handful of 120 film if you hurry and get it now for your freezer.
 
Some cameras are really picky about what film they will take. The Medalist hasn't been one of them in my experience. I've respooled 120 film onto 620 cores and have cut down 120 film to 620 size, both approaches work well with the Medalist. OTOH, with cameras like the Kodak Duo 620, you have to have the film on 620 spools or the camera jams up.

So I wouldn't see a big market for converted cameras, especially since the conversion actually breaks thru the original wall of the film chamber.

Just my 2¢ worth.

Best,
-Tim
 
Dan Daniel said:
Just poking around to see what people think. Would you buy a converted Medalist? Would you send yours off to somebody to do this? Would you do it for $100 but no way for $500? Any comments appreciated!
Click to expand...

I had mine recently CLA and I asked about converting it tp 120 (just the new roll side, not the take up). The reply was that it was too time consuming and they weren't doing it at this time. They mentioned they were considering it (I assume because so many people asked about it). Fantastic camera and lens. I'd probably pay $200 for the convenience which is probably too low.
 
I just now saw that. When I googled it, I was sent to the web page that gave pricing info. Later I discovered that he was now retired, and came back here to add that. In any case, those prices are interesting.
 
I had mine overhauled and converted to 120 by Ken Ruth. Mine had a decemented viewfinder eyepiece doublet, so Ken separated the elements and recemented them. The overall cost of the overhaul was over $600.

The camera came back dirty. Ken doesn't seem to bother to remove the metal shavings very carefully. Also, on one part of the film chamber wall he took so much metal away that he perforated through into the chamber behind the lens.

Anyway, after I had cleaned everything up, and sealed off the perforation with black metal epoxy, it has been a great camera.

Ken provided a list of the shutter speeds as tested. 1/400 was only about 1/3 stop faster than 1/200.

Frank Marshman has a stock of Kodak Flash Supermatic shutter springs (OEM - he bought as much as he could when Kodak was getting rid of them). He put a new one in mine, and the speeds all went up by 1/3 stop. However, the 1/400 is at best 1/2 stop faster than the 1/200 speed.

I tried the 620 respooling business once or twice before the conversion, and it's just too much headache for me. So yes, I did pay a lot to get this camera worked over. It is one of Kodak's finest, and deserves to be enjoyed conveniently.
 
If you develop your own film, respooling 120 onto 620 spools isn't much more difficult than loading film onto developing reels. They both require practice at getting good at in the dark. But if you can already do one, then learning the other is much easier. I got a 620 spool from a long-expired roll of Verichrome and just used that to practice respooling with in daylight. When I was comfortable, I then did a roll in the changing bag and had no problems. So, to me, the 120 mod isn't worth the time, effort, or money.
 
Thanks to everyone for taking the time to reply. Very helpful!

Robert, I saw your comments elsewhere about the conversion that you had done. Ater looking over that thread and the photos from people, I knew that I would want to approach it differently. By stripping the camera down and removing parts for machining, dust and chips won't be an issue. And since so much of the camera will need to be reassembled and adjusted as part of this, I would simply do a thorough overhaul.

As others have said, I respool 120 onto 620 for using my Medalist. I'll probably convert one of mine for the fun of it and see what I think.

Thanks again!
 
The option seemed desirable at one time, but after seeing some photos done of the work, I've decided to keep my Medalist all-original. I think my money would be better spent on film for the camera.

Now if I could send you a box of 120 film and 620 spools and you'd respool everything for me for a reasonable cost, like $3-$4 a roll....
 
For reference, I picked up an already-converted Medalist II a few years ago for $300. I haven't seen many other converted ones for sale so I'm not sure how people value them.

If anything, the price of the Medalists dropped since then. People tend to be less willing to put money in to servicing cameras with lower price points. It may be hard to find a sufficient number of people willing to pay for conversions at this point.

That said, I think you'd have the market cornered. It would be great to have someone both actively doing the conversion and as an expert in CLA'ing the cameras.

I'd pay $300 for a combined conversion/CLA to someone I trusted to do it right. Without an existing body of work demonstrating ability (or a reputation for servicing the camera), I'd have a hard time putting down that much.
 
Dan Daniel said:
I finally had time to go digging into a Kodak Medalist to see what would be involved in modifying the film chambers to work with 120. And I see a way to do it very cleanly. Basically you can machine out the film chambers and build a new wall with a larger diameter chamber for the 120 spool.

This does involve breaking down the camera to the bare frame to remove the film chamber parts. A good time to clean everything and get the full wind system, rangefinder, and shutter working well.

This would probably cost in the $300 to $500 range, including the overhaul. Camera itself, if I did it on spec, would add to the cost.

Just poking around to see what people think. Would you buy a converted Medalist? Would you send yours off to somebody to do this? Would you do it for $100 but no way for $500? Any comments appreciated!
Click to expand...

Hey Dan,
hope you're good.
I just thought I would share this link with you. I know very little about the Medalists, being 620, umm, there are great cameras out there that take 120. Still, I have not been blind to the performance of their Ektar lenses. They do seem to be something very special (I always felt a Medalist would be the one camera to tempt me to bother re-rolling 120, just because of its lens, but you know how it is, too many cameras, not enough time, yada yada).

Anyway. I follow Christopher Schwer on Flickr. He does some beautiful black and whites with various classic cameras you would like. And this image from him popped up the other day. I'm almost reluctant to post it, because it seems too good to be true and if so it may send prices north. If it is, readers, keep it under your hat please. Some of us might want a Medalist at a decent price...

But from what I can gather, using the accessory back you can fit a rollfilm 120 mag and shoot 120 that way. Maybe even in several aspect ratios? Not ever having even handled a Medalist, I was having trouble getting my head around whether or not you'd actually get infinity focus this way.

But I think the penny's dropped. They have a retractable lens. And page 35 of the user manual (that shows a photo of the accessory back) refers to a "Compensating Key for Difference in Film Planes" (a sort of tab visible on the top of the accessory back). So I'm guessing that when this is used the lens extension can be reduced, fractionally, to restore the back focus on infinity to the correct position. Does this sound right? Remember, I've never seen one of these peculiar but fascinating things in the flesh.

Chris's image shows boxes for a Medalist accessory back and also some "Kodak Tourist Adapter Kit". The former is on offer at present on eBay for only $40 or so.

I don't know if you'd still have to turn the body wind knob or not. The manual mentioned something about a cocking lever for the shutter. Obviously you'd use the wind knob or lever on the back to advance the roll. But it all sounds very interesting indeed, and very do-able. And I can't see any reason why, if you had more than one compatible back, that you couldn't even do mid-roll film changes if you wanted.

Seems too good to be true, doesn't it? So, what am I missing? 🙂

FYI, Mike has copies of the instructions for the camera and also the accessory backs here.
Cheers,
Brett
 
I had a Medalist converted by Ken Ruth 8 years ago, and while the ergonomics of the camera are not great it takes superb images. Ken was really helpful and he would take the time to explain things over the phone. Something I always remember him telling me is that if you want the absolute best sharpness from the camera (indeed any camera) only wind to the next frame when you are ready to shoot as ideal film tension can only be maintained for so long.
 
Thanks again for the comments. I will go ahead and convert a Medalist, use it as a prototype and a sample for myself. Then I'll see if it is worth even discussing with others. I'll report back later on the mod.

Brett, the back you reference looks interesting. But it strikes me that the guy is darn close to a basic view camera with roll film back by the time you do all that. I have a 105mm Ektar (same design and quality as the Medalist lens) that I used on a Horseman VH with a Horseman 6x9 back. This also gave me the option of others lenses and swings and tilts.

Part of the attraction of the Medalist is its relatively compact size and integrated use. For your info, the Medalist has both a simple frame counter/ shutter cocking mode of operation where you fire the shutter, wind forward, fire, etc. Well, after the ritual to get to frame 1. The integration is not absolute, though. I use a cable release with mine. This bypasses the shutter release. So after I take a shot, I need to push the shutter release (shutter is now uncocked and does not fire) in order to release the film wind system. And there is also a separate shutter cocking lever if you want double exposures.

All in all it's a rather annoying camera to use. And very 'American' in its blocky design and clunky mechanics- no fine German engineering and machine work here! If it wasn't for the lens I doubt few people would bother with it.
 
Daniel -
I like my Medalist and use it a lot. I would be interested. I will check back to see how you made on converting yours. Please consider offering a feed-side only conversion (as did Ken Ruth).
Regards and good luck!
 
Beemermark said:
I had mine recently CLA ...
Click to expand...

Hi Beemermark,

I just got a Medalist II, and am looking for a recommendation reference for CLA. While there are many references to Ken Ruth at Bald Mountain, I see that he retired a few years back. Your post came up in a web search, for more recent Medalist CLA.

I am a newbie poster, here, though I have landed on this forum a number of times in the past few years, doing research as I've added Japanese 35mm rangefinders to my collection.

More recently, I have added a Rapid Omega 100, and a Mamiya Super 23. I plan to shoot with the medium format RFs, as I get them tested, and find subjects worthy of the format.
 
I acquired a nice Duo 620, and I have some of the Kodak and Argus pseudo-TLRs that would be fun to use but haven't attempted to do the re-spooling yet. It has crossed my mind that some mechanically inclined tinkerer with plenty of time on their hands could come up with a hand cranked re-spooling rig that one could operate in your changing bag or tent. Anyone on here ever rigged such a tool together?

Stan
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Fuji GW690II Frame Overlap: Resolved
Replies
0
Views
484
chuckroast
C
robertofollia
Kodak Stuttgart factory pics
Replies
0
Views
335
robertofollia
robertofollia
Muggins
Kodak Tri-X Pan 120 - any idea of age?
Replies
13
Views
817
Muggins
Muggins
G
Estate Sale of Kodak Medalist 11 help please.
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
campy
C
J
  • Article Article
The Rise & Fall of the Kodak Empire:Part 1: How Kodak came to dominate the photographic industry
Replies
10
Views
3K
rick oleson
rick oleson
Back
Top Bottom