peter_n
Veteran
A couple of weeks ago we found a big box in the attic that contains a number of smaller boxes of Kodachrome slides. They are mostly perfect and they were shot a long, long time ago. Sad news indeed.
***Kodak Retires Kodachrome Film***
- Thread starter KM-25
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 175
- Views 15K
jan normandale
Film is the other way
I got this as an email. I'm going to shoot mine. I just have to figure out the right project for it.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
My snapshots won't ever be the same after I finish my Kodachrome. This has been my main family picture film since I had kids.
You posted as I was writing Peter- I too have several boxes of Kodachrome my great aunt shot fifty years ago that are indeed perfect, and lots of Kodachrome my father shot all throughout my childhood- just as clean as in 1962.
You posted as I was writing Peter- I too have several boxes of Kodachrome my great aunt shot fifty years ago that are indeed perfect, and lots of Kodachrome my father shot all throughout my childhood- just as clean as in 1962.
Last edited:
capitalK
Warrior Poet :P
I bought the last 4 rolls from my local mom and pop camera shop today after hearing the news. I go to Newfoundland in August... Dwayne's will process up until December so I can have one last hurrah with it this summer.
eavis
Member
sickened. but made myself feel a tad better by buying 64 rolls of 64 from B&H. i now know what i'll be shooting for the next 18 months -- all my 200 and 64.
sanmich
Veteran
Now if only Dwayne could commit to a longer deadline, I would stock them and shoot them as long as I can...
Even by small batches, say, once in a month...
Even by small batches, say, once in a month...
david.elliott
Well-known
If every RFF member donated a few dollars, we could set up our own kodachrome lab 😀
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
I'm sure Dwayne's would make you a good deal on one, david 😉
BillBingham2
Registered User
On the positive side, I got to use it for many years.
B2 (;-<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
B2 (;-<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Tuolumne
Veteran
Here's a chance for someone who believes in niche, boutique markets to put his money where his eye is.
/T
/T
sanmich
Veteran
I don't know about buying the lab (well, ok, I think I figure this one), but what about a group of people commiting to dwayne for a certain amount of rolls a year, and Dwayne commiting to process until... ?
I, for one, could easily plan my shooting and pay in advance for a certain number of years ahead.
I, for one, could easily plan my shooting and pay in advance for a certain number of years ahead.
robertdfeinman
Robert Feinman
history
history
I was working a summer job in a photo lab when Kodak discontinued Ektachrome E1 in favor of E2/E3. The studio pros mostly shot 8x10 and were used to its characteristics.
Many stockpiled the old formulation and the labs were forced to keep a second line running for several years to accommodate their customers. E1 was slow and had a very limited, low contrast color palette. You can see how it looked if you read issues of Vogue or similar from the 1950's and early 1960's. No one would go back to using a film that looked like E1 these days.
Kodachrome has its faults, the most serious being a tendency for skies to go magenta. Like the E1 palette, fans just seem not to notice.
About 10 years ago I switched to shooting all color negative after I started scanning in the film. The increased latitude and freedom to adjust the output mean that many prized characteristics can now be achieved through other means. In the photo lab we had detailed procedures to alter film speed and color balance during processing, since the transparency was the end product that was sent to the printer. I'm sure people are glad they don't have to deal with this limitation anymore as well.
Film longevity is an issue and given Kodak (and others) misinformation over the years about this it is impossible to really know what will last. Even digital prints make questionable claims and the testing done by Wilhelm uses accelerated techniques which may not adequate reflect the real world over time.
What can you do, life consists of compromises.
I suppose Kodak could offer to sell it's process information to one of the specialty film makers, and they could continue to make it as they have done emulating other discontinued films. I doubt the demand would be great enough even for them. At one time there was a competitor to Kodachrome made by Dynacolor I think, so recreating the technology is not really that difficult. It is the processing that needs to be tightly controlled.
history
I was working a summer job in a photo lab when Kodak discontinued Ektachrome E1 in favor of E2/E3. The studio pros mostly shot 8x10 and were used to its characteristics.
Many stockpiled the old formulation and the labs were forced to keep a second line running for several years to accommodate their customers. E1 was slow and had a very limited, low contrast color palette. You can see how it looked if you read issues of Vogue or similar from the 1950's and early 1960's. No one would go back to using a film that looked like E1 these days.
Kodachrome has its faults, the most serious being a tendency for skies to go magenta. Like the E1 palette, fans just seem not to notice.
About 10 years ago I switched to shooting all color negative after I started scanning in the film. The increased latitude and freedom to adjust the output mean that many prized characteristics can now be achieved through other means. In the photo lab we had detailed procedures to alter film speed and color balance during processing, since the transparency was the end product that was sent to the printer. I'm sure people are glad they don't have to deal with this limitation anymore as well.
Film longevity is an issue and given Kodak (and others) misinformation over the years about this it is impossible to really know what will last. Even digital prints make questionable claims and the testing done by Wilhelm uses accelerated techniques which may not adequate reflect the real world over time.
What can you do, life consists of compromises.
I suppose Kodak could offer to sell it's process information to one of the specialty film makers, and they could continue to make it as they have done emulating other discontinued films. I doubt the demand would be great enough even for them. At one time there was a competitor to Kodachrome made by Dynacolor I think, so recreating the technology is not really that difficult. It is the processing that needs to be tightly controlled.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Sad day. On the bright side I am sure glad some evil genius invented it in the first place as my childhood family photos will be safe for many decades to come.
I have been shooting Kodachrome a lot recently... let us all enjoy it while it is still here.
Kent
I have been shooting Kodachrome a lot recently... let us all enjoy it while it is still here.
Kent
wjlapier
Well-known
If anything, this will make me shoot the last of my stock. I was going to use Ektar this summer while on vacation in Montana. I guess I'll bring my KR64 instead.
Question: How best to use my four rolls of KR25?
Question: How best to use my four rolls of KR25?
Bike Tourist
Well-known
Out of my 30,000 slides, probably 60% are Kodachrome, so I can still reminisce about it.
Truth-be-told, it doesn't scan as well as the Ektachromes, so I won't miss it in daily use as some of you will. Sad to see it roll up into that big cassette of history!
Truth-be-told, it doesn't scan as well as the Ektachromes, so I won't miss it in daily use as some of you will. Sad to see it roll up into that big cassette of history!
Gumby
Veteran
When was the last time they pitched it? Maybe I haven't been paying attention but I haven't seen a Kodak pitch for Kodachrome in years... many years. Like you, I'm a bit saddened but understand their decision.... just like I understood, but didn't like, the Polaroid decision.
Ben Z
Veteran
As an historical icon, and for the people who still are using it, this is sad news. For me, Kodachrome took a bit hit around 1974 when Kodachrome-II was replaced by Kodachrome-25, which was not as color saturated, and was more contrasty (narrower latitude). However I continued to shoot it until it was discontinued, but that was the end of the line for me and Kodachrome. I just never liked 64.
bean_counter
Well-known
I have always wanted to do a 'photo every day for a year' project, of the same landscape as it changes during the year.
There's a farm field bordered by woods on my way to work, with home construction encroaching in the distance; I think I will start it in August or September, and donate the slides to the local historical society.
There's a farm field bordered by woods on my way to work, with home construction encroaching in the distance; I think I will start it in August or September, and donate the slides to the local historical society.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
It's a long shot, I know...
It's a long shot, I know...
I can only hope that the outcry (and SALES) make Kodak reverse their decision.
Chris
It's a long shot, I know...
I can only hope that the outcry (and SALES) make Kodak reverse their decision.
Chris
cmdrzed
wallflower
I made a purchase earlier. In fact, my order was placed prior to hearing the news of its demise. Now I wish I had ordered more. It will be my first time using kodachrome and I guess my last. 🙁 It just looks so nice.
Similar threads
- Article
