Leica 50 ?

I value your opinion Krosya maybe yes maybe not to buy another 50 lens. The Canon 50 1.4 has an LTM to M adapter and when you look at the lens it is not centered, I mean the center point is at the left hand side which is quite irritating. I got the adapter from Stephen maybe something worng? Would it be better to have the proper M mount just like the numerous toys you have which can also do the same thing as the others?

My Canon 50 1.4 with adapter is mounted the same way as yours.
 
I pushed the button it's the Elmar-M 2.8. I'll use the canon for those times that I need it. It's quite heavy though and the focusing tab is not as smooth as I would like it to be. Thank you for all the replies. Btw, the elmar is in chrome EX+ with caps and hood from a reputable used camera dealer with a $ 40 difference vs the Hex.
 
Ok,
Lets be honest. Your Canon is just fine and will do what those other lenses can. So, you really dont "NEED" a new lens. So, this means that you "WANT" a new lens, as you say - it will look good on your M3. In that case - just get Elmar , end of story. They all perform well. Neither Cron or Elmar will give you any benefits for available light you say you fond of. I'd stay with Canon if you are happy with it and wouldnt waste my money on somethng that looks good. Are you going to shoot with it or turn it into a shelf queen? Now if you were looking for a specific signature or sharpness or extra speed - I could see need to upgrade. Otherwise - I'd buy more film or go some place interesting to take pics with the money I saved not buying a new toy. Just my 2 cents.

I've been looking all over for the Hex as I was researching the Elmar in the net. I was writing Konika Hex 50 2.0 in the search window of Ebay but not getting results the last few days. Anyway I opted to get the Elmar.

Btw, the sentence was taken out of context, you may need to read the whole before you interpret the wrong way. The looks is just one of the merits as in the full sentence I wrote below:

"I love the looks of the M3 with a chrome Elmar and from what I've been reading, this lens performs well in the area of sharpness and flare."

That is the reason why I opted to ask the forum which I believe can give me the unbiased answers and not to be pilloried for raising it here 😉
 
It's a great lense and has become my go-to for my MP when I know I'm gonna be back before nightfall...

3585274522_56ffc10e32_o.jpg


One thing: may be an idea to use contrasty film - the lense has a lovely old-skool style softness to it that means you can take liberties with the emulsion...
 
Another vote for the M-Hexanon 50mm f2.0. Very clear and crisp shots, very durable built and handles like a dream. Intermittent click stops, all metal barrel, built-in sun hood. 45 degree focus throw, very quick to focus! Takes 40.5mm filters, easy to find. Brilliant lens! Real value for money. No drawbacks.
 
My Canon 50 1.4 with adapter is mounted the same way as yours.

As far as I can tell, all the Canon LTM lenses mount with the aperture and distance scale index marks at about 35 degrees to left of top center. I have the 25/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 50/3.5 collapsible, 50/1.8, 50/1.5 and 50/1.2 -- so that's a pretty good sample to extrapolate from. 😀

::Ari
 
Sudden change of events, I did not realize the card no. I had on file with the dealer just expired last month. Now I need to scan and send the renewed one. I just cancelled the order and got the Hex 50 2.0 instead. Thank you Krosya for leading me to the avaiable Ebay seller. The price they gave is lower than what they had yesterday by a couple of $. And btw I trust Matsuiya ebay store is accurate in their descriptions. Paypal is always an easier transaction when you are buying, refunds are a PITA though. Thanks guys for the great information, I'll keep my eye for an Elmar in the distant future. I also saw 2 pcs. Exc+ 90 2.8 Hex in their site, this is the next in line to research.
 
I agree that the Elmar-M is a great lens! I have 3 50s in M mount and this one is non-trade-able or sell-able; I'll hang onto mine unto the ages of ages 😉

2526254703_74f85df878.jpg
 
Nice pics Gil, the low contrast gives the pictures an "old" feel with nice shadow detail. You didn't tell me you were going to the bay, missed another photo op again 🙂
 
Oh good grief.

Buy a period correct 51.9mm Dual Range Summicron. Your photos may look different. The lens will certainly LOOK good on the M3. Decent examples can be had for $300, give or take. Goggles may cost extra.

I own a 1961 DR Summicron. It's a favorite.

Huge OOPS!

I didn't see the Hexanon photos. Now I may have to decide if I wish to keep the DR or get the Hexanon.

I hate when this happens.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom