Leica LTM Leica IIIB Lens Options

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

AlTheKiller

Established
Local time
4:05 AM
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
189
I am looking to find another lens for my IIIB but I honestly don't even know where to start. Id like to go with a 35mm if possible but Id consider staying with a 50mm. Id rather not spend $1200 on a new setup so I was thinking of going with a non Leica lens.

I found an adapter to use my Nikkor 50mm but it seems you cant use the range finder with that setup?
 
Indeed you can't.

Why do you want another lens? What do you want it to do that your present lens can't? Until you can answer that, it's impossible to decide what you want/need.

Cheers,

R.
 
Agree, otherwise, you will only get our own wishful ravings :)

Portrait? Landscape? Low light photography? Looking for a smaller lens? What r you looking for?

By the way, I also have/use a IIIb. Great camera, although most often than not I stick to a IIf. The slow speed dial kinda get on my way. Probably just the way I grip the camera or my finger are too long :).

Regards

Marcelo
 
I bought the camera next to nothing a little while ago and the 50mm works but not very smoothly. You can see that it had been dropped at one point which bent the outer edge of the lens and I think tweaked something to cause the focus lever to get real tight at a certain point. Its not smooth but does work.

I like using the IIIb as my general walking around camera and I feel the 50mm is too tight. I like photographing people but would like more of the surroundings in frame.

Honestly thought about investing in a M2 and 35mm lens but I don't think I can justify the cost so I thought maybe I can run a 35 on the IIIb

The 50mm Nikkor I have is an F mount D series.
 
LOL That it wasn't a M39 LTM slipped by me. ;)

If it was me, I'd be looking at a 35mm. I agree; I find the 50mm is a bit too long for a carry-around camera.
 
I bought the camera next to nothing a little while ago and the 50mm works but not very smoothly. You can see that it had been dropped at one point which bent the outer edge of the lens and I think tweaked something to cause the focus lever to get real tight at a certain point. Its not smooth but does work...
'It it with a 'ammer. Quite carefully, and a fairly small 'ammer; but you might be surprised at how successful this can be. Take it off the camera first!

Cheers,

R.
 
For a 35, SERIOUSLY consider the 35/2.5 Color Skopar. If the chassis was distorted too, the 35/1.7 Ultron (a superb lens) might be a little too demanding. Where are you?

Cheers,

R.
 
Agree with Roger. Also, you may consider a Summaron 35 f3.5. I own both the 35 and the 2.8 and I like 2.8 better, but it can be expensive.


Be patient and you may find a deal, like I did.

Regards

Marcelo
 
Although it never gets much love, the original Leica 35 - the 3.5 Elmar - can give great results and is the least expensive of the LTM Leica 35s. I have one for my IIIa and the combo is truly pocketable.
 

I have Jupiter-12 as my first 35mm focal length, makes pretty pictures, then while spending too much time on the internet reading about Voigtlander 35mm (2.5/1.7), eventual I have them all (except the 1.4), and with the 2-3 fold more money compare with Jupiter-12, I can't see the different!

The only caveat for the Jupiter-12 is that the big rear element that you need to be careful about, and its aperture ring is the darnest thing on any lens ever produced interm of ergonomics.

If that bother you, you can get the Voigtlander color skopar like Roger suggested, then you don't need to get the Jupiter-12, it not, color skopar best bet.

Sooo... if you can get a Jupiter-12 for under $100 + ship, perfect! you don't need others (unless GAS attack, well then...)
 
Although it never gets much love, the original Leica 35 - the 3.5 Elmar - can give great results and is the least expensive of the LTM Leica 35s. I have one for my IIIa and the combo is truly pocketable.

Thats a great lens for street photography, even smaller than Summaron.

U47399I1488383932.SEQ.0.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom