Leica M Preconceptions

Peter Jennings

Well-known
Local time
3:27 AM
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
664
Location
Seoul
A couple weeks ago I came into possession of my first M - an early M2. I had never even handled a Leica of any stripe prior to receiving it, and I had several preconceptions about the M and Leicas in general that I have had time to hash out in my mind since getting my M2.

Preconception #1: The flash sockets on the back of early Ms always seemed horribly misplaced and surely must inhibit one’s use of the camera. Conclusion: Don’t know about the first point (never use flash), but they don’t bother me at all in use. Mine are uncapped, but I can’t see that the plastic caps would bother me at all while shooting. I just don’t notice them at all.

Preconception #2: Release button on film advance post seemed a purely aesthetic affectation and would not affect use. Conclusion: Genius! They thought of this in the early 50s and for years after most camera makers continued to put the shutter release in its own exclusive spot. The fact that shooting with an M seems much faster to me is largely due in my opinion to this seemingly minor feature.

Preconception #3: Knob rewind is for luddites and it should have been made a crank from the beginning. Conclusion: The M2/M3 knob rewind is better than other knob rewinds I've used in that it isn’t activated until the knob is extended. And crank rewinds aren’t all that much better! I know from experience that keeping a grip on the rewind crank of my Nikons can be tricky. The knob is sturdy and effective.

Preconception #4: Film loading would still be a hideous chore regardless of the M rear door. Conclusion: Film loading is easy-peasy largely BECAUSE of the rear door. Granted, I’ve only put two rolls through the M2 so far, but loading is very easy compared to other bottom loaders I’ve used. Is loading as fast as other cameras of the same period with fully opening backs? No, but it’s not much slower and I don’t find it an inconvenience.

Preconception #5: Leicas are fragile beasts that constantly need CLAs. Conclusion: I got this M2 from a seller in Germany with no knowledge of its provenance or past service history. It had a recessed Leica L seal which tells me it was most likely last serviced at the factory in Wetzlar sometime before 1982. It also has the M4 style mask behind the eyepiece, so the service had to be done after 1967. Even with this, the shutter speeds are all accurate. I haven’t noticed an issue that would lead me to believe this camera is any less reliable than any other old camera I’ve owned. I did pop the top off and clean the RF glass (goodbye L seal), but it’s not going in for a CLA anytime soon.

Preconception #6: Leica build quality can’t be that much better than that of other makes. Conclusion: The build quality is excellent and it seems to be the most refined camera I’ve yet to own. It is heavy - perhaps over-built - but that lends it a feeling of dependability that I appreciate.

So, there are my thoughts. Sorry for any hyperbole, but I’m very pleased with this M2. My preconceptions have largely turned out to be misconceptions. However, as no camera can be perfect, my one gripe is the automatic frame lines - I wish they were selectable like on a Nikon SP. I so far only have LTM lenses, and it would be so much easier (and economical!) if I could use one adapter for all my lenses. The preview lever is nice, but I'd prefer a switch.

Thanks for reading
 
I agree with all of your observations, Peter.
Regarding the frameline switch - I prefer it to be automatic.
On my Bessa R, the framelines are indeed via a switch.
It's another step to have to move the switch when changing lenses.

Also, if you get the Leicameter, you will notice how much easier it is to move the shutter speed dial, as it will now overhang the front edge of the camera. With the Leicameter MR-4, you have a 90mm lens' point of view, and you can use the frameline selector (for the 90mm setting) to give you "fat spot area" metering.
 
Enjoy your M2!

No amount of thinking about, reading about, studying, and fantasizing about a thing like a camera is the same as actually touching and using it. A Leica M is not unique in this regard, it just happens to be a little further out there than some others. The nuances which elevate a Leica camera beyond other cameras of the type have to be experienced with our hands to become clear.

G
 
Zeiss were fitting shutter releases in the centre of their Contaxes wind knobs in the 1930s. OK they had a knob, not a lever, but it is hardly as if Leica thought of it in the 1950s. Actually it was not until the M3 was released that Leica finally caught up with Zeiss and (in certain respects, others not so much) surpassed them.
Enjoy your M. They're a good thing I think. Their rangefinders are almost as accurate as a Contax. High praise.
 
Nice review. I can't for the life of me understand why people hate the bottom loading. Seems so much simpler than the open back cameras. Granted, my Ms all have the "quick-load" tulip... Yes you need to hold the loose bottom of the camera, but it's no heavier than a cigar.
 
I agree with all of your points, Peter. To me, the single greatest feature of the M2 is the beautiful, bright, uncluttered finder. I use a 35mm lens for 75% of my shooting, and with the M2 it's an ideal combination. I bought a spare take-up spool and carry a roll "pre-loaded" and ready to go. Helps a lot if I get to the end of a roll at an inconvenient time.

Mine was last serviced about 10 years ago and I probably put 3-4 rolls a month thru it. Not one hiccup or problem in that time.
 
Well said!
The Leica-M's, M2 and earlier more sophisticated M3 were designed,
for the long haul of a working pro.
Any raw amateur can learn to use one in a few minutes. My daughter understood the RFDR in 30 secs.
I showed two fingers on my hand, then turned hand to show one finger.
They exude simplicity. In design and usage.
No camera loads as easily! You simply hook the film in the spool,
drop in, shoot a frame.
You are ready.
I load in the dark and achieve 39~40 exposures on 36 exposure rolls.
The focus is pure easy.
See two images, turn lens, see one and you are done!
The slide in meter is great, making turning shutter very easy.
Its not the most sophisticated meter, yet with a little experience, equal to "Matrix" nonsense.
I have used both..
The camera is compact, with collapsible lens easily carried under a jacket.
My M3 is now suffering with me, 50 years of good and constant usage.
 
I agree with all of your points, Peter. To me, the single greatest feature of the M2 is the beautiful, bright, uncluttered finder...

I didn't mention the finder! I did have some concern over the .72 magnification and wondered how comfortable it would be. But the finder is big and bright and the 35 frame lines are easily visible. And the rf patch is so clearly defined - it does make for somewhat easier focussing than my other rangefinders.
 
Nice insights so early in your ownership. I even love the frame counter, and especially the sound and feel of resetting it. Mine was expertly serviced during my ownership: that counter used to be far too stiff. And the rewind clutch mechanism was ineffective until this service. An M2 should be in any long-term time capsule or space pod sent to other solar systems.
 
When I fondled an M3 DS at the store, I found..

1) Heavy.

2) Slippery!

3) I thought the patch style was very distracting.

4) The shutter was louder than I thought it would be.
 
When I fondled an M3 DS at the store, I found..

1) Heavy.

2) Slippery!

3) I thought the patch style was very distracting.

4) The shutter was louder than I thought it would be.

Good on you! None of this is inaccurate. I was underwhelmed by the M3 viewfinder. The heaviness is a plus. My M2 is perfect for slow exposures thanks to the shutter release and the mass. In a case it is very quiet. In the hands of someone next to you it is scarcely audible.
 
When I fondled an M3 DS at the store, I found..

1) Heavy.

2) Slippery!

3) I thought the patch style was very distracting.

4) The shutter was louder than I thought it would be.

I agree with 1 and 2, but not 3 and 4. I replaced the flaking vulcanite on my M2 with leatherette from Aki Asahi and it is much grippier now. And I was surprised at just how quiet the shutter is. It's quieter than any of my other non-leaf shutter cameras. This may vary from one M to another, I suspect.
 
Back
Top Bottom