Jorge Torralba said:
Harry, its cheaper than a d2x and will probably hold its value since there wont be an m9 in 6 mnth like canon and nikon do 🙂
True, it's cheaper or no more expensive than the big guns from Canon or Nikon.
For me the issue is that I really have no need to shoot digital.
Last October I purchased a Canon 5D. I used it a few times and then it ended up on the shelf. In the end I sold it because it was depreciating rapidly and it wasn't generating any income or getting used enough to justify its cost. Nowadays I simply rent a DSLR when I need one.
I rarely shoot color. Instead I'm a Tri-X kind of guy.
I don't have to meet insane deadlines or deliver pictures via satellite phone from the field.
When I do shoot a paying job, one of the reasons why people hire me is because I still shoot black/white film.
I'm really not that crazy about how digital looks.
I have a really good scanner, so in a sense I am digital while enjoying the long-term benefits of analog storage.
BUT, there are certain issues that would compel me to buy an M8:
- If traveling with film becomes absolutely impossible.
- If I landed a job that demanded digital and would pay for the camera.
- If I really needed a difgital camera for work on a consistent basis.
But regardless I wish that Leica had been able to price the camera at $2999. Perhaps that is only possible if they moved production to China or somewhere, but nearly 5k is really pushing it out of reach for a lot of people who would otherwise buy one. In conjunction with a 28mm lens you are looking at about $7000 - 8000. That's pretty crazy, even by Leica standards and I'm not even sure if it is enough 'camera' to justify that kind of price.
HL